Posted by blue on January 12, 1999 at 20:51:06:
In Reply to: abuse of Darwin posted by rpcman on January 12, 1999 at 18:11:32:
: How do you counter the charge that there is a lack in the fossil record of intermediate forms? I was listening to a creationist many years ago, I believe his name was Ken Ham, who stated that Darwin assumed the fossil record would eventually "fill in the gaps" between the species we observe today and more primitive species of yesteryear, tracing them back to common ancestry. He (Mr. Ham) then stated that this fossil record does not exist.
Is he correct? If so, what is the reason?