Posted by Pierre Charles on July 03, 1998 at 12:55:23:
In Reply to: Abiogenesis posted by rpcman on July 02, 1998 at 14:12:21:
: Which of the above is most plausible and why? Which of the above 'conjectures' is most 'asinine' and why? Are there any other possibilities which are more believable?
Every of the above choices speak of "how it all started". It think there's a difference between life on the earth and the Universe. For the Universe, our brain has great
difficulties in accepting something that has "NO BEGINNING". Nothing is created, nothing is lost, everything is "transformed".
For life on the earth it is another story which is link to the preceding concept of "Infinity"
Humans created other Humans in their image. It is a "directed panspermia". It is also a reconciliation between science and religion.
We will create life as we have been created.
"The first will be the last and the last will be the first"
It is an infinite cycle of creation/destruction.
[ Follow Ups ] [ Exmormon.org- Honest Inquiry Message Board ] [ FAQ ]