Subject: FARMS Update (June 1985): Moses, Moroni, and the Salamander
Date: May 05 14:37
Author: Makurosu

The document referred to below, "Martin Harris Letter of 23 Oct. 1830...", was claimed to be a genuine document found by Mark Hofmann.  The church accepted it as genuine and FARMS went to work on it.  FARMS, in their form of apologetics, defended the document as further proof of the claims of Mormonism.  Well,  the truth was something else.  Hofmann was a forger and the document a fake.  This is a great resource to show how FARMS spins damaging information to keep Mormons under the illusion that all is well in Mormonism.  This is true too of their defenses of the Book of Abraham and the Book of Mormon.

Exmormon.org May 2003

 

F.A.R.M.S. UPDATE
(c) June 1985

Moses, Moroni, and the Salamander

Martin Harris' letter of 23 October 1830 to Wm. W. Phelps (published in Church News, 28 April 1985) has dismayed some people. Harris talks of a "white salamander" which was "transfigured" into "the spirit" otherwise known to us as the Angel Moroni. We may never know whether this description was an embellishment on the part of Harris, or an allegory employed by Joseph Smith, or whether Moroni somehow chose to appear to Joseph out of, or in the form of, a salamander. But since Phelps joined the Church after reading Harris' letter, he must not have found the allusion to a salamander very disconcerting. In fact, as new research is showing, the salamander has been thought for millennia to have supernatural and extraordinary powers. Consider the following:

1. Well into the 19th century, it was commonly believed that salamanders "lived in or were able to endure, fire." Numerous references to this wide-spread belief are listed in the Oxford English Dictionary under "salamander." Long before, even Aristotle -- of all people -- reported: "The salamander shows that certain animals are naturally proof against fire, for it is said to extinguish a flame by passing through it." Historia Animalium V.19, 552b.

2. Indeed, salamanders were thought to be "generated in fire." The great Rabbi Akiba held to this view, in Hullin 127a. Other rabbis, including the noted Rashi, debated whether the fire had to be heated for seven days, seven years or seventy years to produce a salamander that would appear walking and flying in the midst of the fire. (Should we compare Dan. 3:19ff.?)

3. Accordingly, salamanders were often associated with spirits. In Germany, salamanders were thought to be "Wetter-propheten" (weather-prophets), and "Hausgeister" (house-protector spirits). German churchdoor locks and bolts, as well as ovens and fireplaces, had salamander insignia on them. Handwoerterbuch des deutschen Aberglaubens (Berlin, 1934), 6:458. In the Middle Ages, the salamander denoted "a being possessing the shape of a man whose element was the fire, or who at least could live in that element." Chambers's Encycl. (1875), 8:436. Earth, air, fire and water, each had a spirit -- for fire, it was the salamander.

4. Moreover, salamanders were associated with the voice of God and with the Holy Ghost! From Midrash Ex. Rabbah XV.28 on Exodus 12, we find that the rabbis of the 9th Century A.D. and before believed that "God had to show Moses on Mt. Sinai was the salamander: "He stirred up the fire and showed him the salamander, for it [Ps. 29:7] says: The voice of the Lord heweth out flames of fire." In 1841, the baptistry of Winchester Cathedral in England bore the figure of a salamander, alluding to the words, "He shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire." G. A. Poole, Churches: Their Struct. Arrang. & Decor. 9,2.

5. Since the salamander was said to endure fire, it was thought to protect others against burning, including hell-fire. The rabbis remarked that hell would not harm scribes, since they were "all fire, like the Torah; and if flames cannot hurt one who is anointed with salamander blood, still less can they injure the scribes." Jewish Encycl. (1905) 10:646, citing the Talmud Hagiga 27a. A similar popular belief seems to stand behind Austrian lore relating the salamander to the atoning suffering of Christ. The Zohar (ii. 211b) mentions protective garments of salamander skin.

6. Not far removed from these ideas about salamanders are ideas depicted by the biblical phrase "fiery flying serpents" Were these "salamanders"? A brass model of this reptile symbolized Jesus himself, who commanded Moses to put it up on a pole, so the people who had been bitten could look to it and live (Num. 21:6-9; 1 Ne. 17:41; cf. Is. 14:29; 30:6; 2 Ne. 25:20). The Hebrew word here for "fiery" is saraf. This strongly suggests a further connection with the six-winged seraphim (Is. 6:2-6) and the nearly identical cherubin (Ezek. 1 & 10; Rev. 4:6-8). Cf. Egyptian srf ("griffon"). Were their six wings and abstraction from the six, red, wing-like, external gills of salamanders?

7. Eternal life and resurrection were also symbolized by the salamander. The Arabic word for both the salamander and the phoenix, which could die and rise again out of its own ashes, was samandal. Se Al-Jahiz, Kitab al-Hayawan (9th c.) 5:309-10 (Harun edition); S. Nasser, Intro. to Islamic Cosmology, 2d ed., 273 n. 29.

8. People too were sometimes called salamanders. Shakespeare calls a fiery-red face a "salamander." Henry IV, III, iii, 58. Likewise called were soldiers who courageously exposed themselves to fire in battle. Salamanders appear in medieval and renaissance coats of arms, including that of Francis I, King of France. Thomas Brooks in 1670 wrote, "God's people are true salamanders, the live best in the fire of afflictions." Works 6:441.

9. Not all salamanders were good, however. The poisonous ones are "spectacularly colored" with bright spots on a dark background. Encycl. Brit. (15th ed.), Macrop. 18:1087. They were linked with evil spirits. But the non-poisonous good ones were white or grey-brown.

Obviously, much has changed culturally since 1830. Some of us may wince at the suggestion that an angel of God should be associated with, or described as, a salamander. But to people then, no image or description would better fit the appearance of a brillant white spiritual being, once a valiant soldier, now dwelling in a blazing pillar of light, shockingly pure and glorious, speaking with the voice of God while flying though the midst of Heaven, then the salamander! Moroni should be flattered. (JS-H 1:30-32; History of the Church 4:536).

Still, it was predictable that people would not understand this. The Lord apparently knew this would happen. In 1829, God commanded Harris not to try to describe things which he had not personally witnessed: "And I the Lord command him, my servant Martin Harris, that he shall say no more unto them concerning these things, except he shall say: I have seen them, and they have been shown unto me by the power of God; and these are the words which he shall say." D&C 5:26. Harris seems to have overstepped his commission here when he wrote to Phelps in 1830.

Further research is still underway. Glenn Clark's recent "Pillars of My Faith" presentation at the Sunstone Theological Symposium (May 18, 1985) covers several of these points and will soon appear in Sunstone. In the end, this research may lead to a less "modern" view of many symbolically meaningful religious events: a burning bush; a talking ass; a flaming sword; a tempting snake; the Lord with seven horns and seven eyes; a descending dove; and a salamander angel.

(FAIR USE COPYING NOTICE: These pages may be reproduced and used, without alteration, addition or deletion, for any nonpecuniary or non-publishing purpose, without permission.)



Subject: LOL! Sounds just like FARMS. Defending the indefensible, and in this case, defending a lie. nt


Subject: Isn't that article great?
Date: May 05 15:37
Author: Makurosu

"Classic" FARMS reads like the National Enquirer. I have all their FARMS Updates from 1984-89. They're all a page each and are written anonymously, or at least no author is named in them. They could almost be narrated by Leonard Nimoy from "In Search Of..."

Yep, this is Mormonism's finest in scholarship.

Subject: Some quotes from an anti-FARMS website
Date: May 05 16:39
Author: alex

I found a few quotes on an anti-FARMS website that totally contradict the FARMS way of publishing articles without an author.

http://scriptures.lds.org/rom/1/16 - I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ.

http://scriptures.lds.org/matt/5/16 - Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works.

http://scriptures.lds.org/dc/1/3 - Their iniquities shall be spoken upon the housetops, and their secret acts shall be revealed.

This scriptures.lds.org website sure is anti-FARMS.

Subject: LOL!! Pro-dogma vs pro-truth
Date: May 05 18:39
Author: Gunshy

While the FARMS-bots were bending over backwards trying to make a salamander into Moroni, the anti-Mormon Tanners were dismissing Hofman's letter as a probable forgery.

Subject: Their apologetics are more harmful to their cause than the
Date: May 06 06:02
Author: Perry Noid

original embarrassment they seek to hide with their verbal equivalent of a Rube Goldberg contraption.

For example, they may have revealed more than they wanted about the culpable mental state of FARMS apologists when they wrote this gem:

Still, it was predictable that people would not understand this. The Lord apparently knew this would happen. In 1829, God commanded Harris not to try to describe things which he had not personally witnessed: "And I the Lord command him, my servant Martin Harris, that he shall say no more unto them concerning these things, except he shall say: I have seen them, and they have been shown unto me by the power of God; and these are the words which he shall say." D&C 5:26. Harris seems to have overstepped his commission here when he wrote to Phelps in 1830. [Underlining added for emphasis]

Take a minute and think carefully about what is being said here. This is either a stupid non-sequitur or they are saying that Joe Smith got a revelation instructing Martin Harris to lie about things he had not witnessed. This paragraph is clearly constructed so that "these things" in the quoted scripture refers to "things which he had not personally witnessed" in the FARMS author's introduction to the quoted scripture.

Accordingly, the FARMS author is asserting that "God" (i.e., Joe Smith pretending to be God) is telling Martin Harris that when he speaks about the things which he has not personally witnessed, he should not say anything except "I have seen them, and they have been shown unto me by the power of God."

This is what's called "coaching a witness to lie". When a corrupt lawyer coaches a witness to lie, one of the most important things is to ensure that the witness refrains from embellishing the story or inadvertently revealing truths that undermine the story. In the case of a "witness" like Martin Harris, you can be sure that Joe Smith didn't want Martin to tell people that he witnessed the golden plates with "spiritual eyes". No, Joe wanted him to stick to the script and keep it simple. Let the suckers fill in the blanks. Any common drunk can see things with spiritual eyes and you don't want potential suckers, er, converts, discounting the witness on that basis.

However, I really don't believe it was the FARMS author's intent to state that Martin Harris was being coached by "God" to lie about thing he had not witnessed. I just think that this is a good example of the nonsensical nature of FARMS apologetics in general. This one passage from the FARMS piece reveals that the verbal fog spewed out by FARMS is not intended to be thought about carefully. It is intended as a pacifier to the deluded--an illusion to deceive Mormons who want to be deceived in the false comfort that the Mormon "intellectuals" have successfully refuted the critics.


Recovery from Mormonism - www.exmormon.org   

Listing of additional short Topics  |  Main Page