Recovery Board  : RfM
Recovery from Mormonism (RfM) discussion forum. 
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Posted by: dirtbikr ( )
Date: November 28, 2014 02:55PM

Talking with a tbm cousin and the subject of horses in america, he brought up that sir francis drake observed large herds of horses off the oregon coast in 1539. So I googled it up and dang,there is some kind of account of it. So now how do you wrap that around your head that if it is true? Drake must have been smoking something the indians gave him.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: blueorchid ( )
Date: November 28, 2014 03:54PM

Have they dug up horse remains in Oregon and connected them to the Nephite time period?

Are there other accounts of the Oregonian horses or only the Drake account?

Did the first settlers in Oregon make the same reports?

Did they all tame these horses and start using them?

It shouldn't be that hard to find corroboration for Drake's account, which when you look at it sounds awfully iffy given who Drake was. He could have had many reasons for making the report even if it weren't true. We'll probably never know.

I will get excited when they also find chariots and steel swords along the Oregon coast. Every great civilization has left a plethora of archeological proof of their existence except for the Nephites and Lamanites as described in the Book of Mormon. Since the great Nephite/Lamanite civilization numbered in the millions and spread across all the land how could there not be museums full of artifacts by now?

If the Drake item had any merit, it would be trumpeted by every apologist out there. This is the first I've even heard of it.

Thanks for posting. I like these tidbits.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: randyj ( )
Date: November 28, 2014 07:45PM

"I will get excited when they also find chariots and steel swords along the Oregon coast."

That might excite you, but it would upset the Mopologists, 'cuz they assert that Book of Mormon events took place in some small area in Central America, not Oregon. :-)

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: exodus ( )
Date: November 28, 2014 08:25PM

They'll take any place on this hemisphere that sticks. I've heard so many theories - two hill Cumorahs, etc. It simply doesn't add up though... none of the theories make for a complete story... just an attempt to patch together unrelated evidences and a big amount of faith.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: michaelm (not logged in) ( )
Date: November 28, 2014 03:55PM

1539? Drake saw horses a year before he was born? I think you mean 1579.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: exodus ( )
Date: November 28, 2014 05:28PM

Drake saw tapirs, not horses

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Shummy ( )
Date: November 28, 2014 05:51PM

The Spaniards were brining boatloads of horses and breeding them fast and furiously from 1520 on.

Feral herds of straying mustangs quickly followed as a result.

Ideal climate and few competitors made Alta California and New Mexico once again the horse country it had been 10,000 years ago, before the sudden equine die-off.

The paleo-lamanites apparently ate them back then rather that saddling them up for a ride, which led to their extinction .

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Tom Padley ( )
Date: November 28, 2014 05:59PM

And it was all part of God's divine plan to test the faith of TBMs. And all is well in Zion!

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Shummy ( )
Date: November 28, 2014 06:04PM

Pretty sure you straw-clutching cuz was reading this drivel:

http://askgramps.org/3185/is-there-any-archaelogical-evidence-concerning-horses-and-elephants-on-the-american-continent-during-jaredite-and-nephite-times

Old Gramps valiantly struggles to dismiss the feral Spanish horse theory.

But how then would he splain Drake as being the sole witness to any evidence whatsoever of a native horse population?

I call horse$hit.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: randyj ( )
Date: November 28, 2014 06:52PM

"...and though Cortez and his followers saw none alive, yet Admiral Sir Francis Drake did see large bands of wild horses on the Oregon Coast in 1579, far too early for any to have escaped from the Spaniards, grown wild, and traveled so vast a distance” (Reynolds and Sjodahl, Commentary on the Book of Mormon Vol. 6, p.236.)"

The assertion that Cortez saw no horses alive is just stupid, seeing as how Cortez was one of the early explorers who brought horses into Mexico in 1519. For the math-impaired, that's 60 years before the date for Drake cited above. Wild horses constantly migrate, and quickly multiply. In 60 years, they could have grown to great numbers and spread all over the west.

Also, Coronado made it to the Rio Grande with horses in 1540.

"Coronado moves his camp to the upper Rio Grande, where his soldiers confiscate one pueblo for winter quarters and loot the surrounding pueblos for supplies. During this operation, a Spaniard rapes an Indian woman, and when Coronado refuses to punish him, the Indians retaliate by stealing horses."

http://www.pbs.org/weta/thewest/events/1500_1650.htm

So, Indians stole horses in 1540---39 years before Drake saw them in Oregon.

"The conquistadors brought with them the first horses Americans had ever seen.

"Inevitably, some escaped or were stolen by natives; such horses were traded
north through Mexico into the Great Plains where tribes like the Apache,
Comanche, Sioux and Blackfeet eventually made the horse the focal point of
their existence." (A People and a Nation, 1982, Houghton Mifflin, pp.8-9).

"Where did these mustangs come from? The first 'wild' horses were actually
tame horses. They were brought to the New World by Spanish
explorers.......The
explorers' horses were the first such animals that the Indians living in the
Southwest had ever seen. Soon the Indians began using the horse for hunting
and traveling. Eventually, some of the Indians' horses escaped and joined the
horses lost by the Spanish. In the 1840s, when wagon trains of settlers began
crossing the Great Plains, different breeds of horses broke loose from their
owners and ran with the wild horses. Other domestic horses were simply
abandoned to live on the prairies. All these horses, together with the
Spanish
horses, formed the great mustang herds."
("Voyages", Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston, 1989, pp. 74-75).

"For centuries, the Plains Indians hunted the buffalo on foot. In the late
1700s, they started using horses, which had multiplied and spread northward
since the Spanish brought them to Mexico." ("America and Americans", Silver
Burdett, 1983, p. 24).

I cited most of those quotes in a post I wrote on alt.religion.mormon in February 2000, in a response to Mike "chicken and backpacks" Ash. It's disappointing that Mormon apologists are still citing those same discredited arguments 14 years later.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/28/2014 07:03PM by randyj.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: blueorchid ( )
Date: November 28, 2014 07:00PM

The bigger picture! There is always more to the story than you will get from any Mormon apparently. Thank you.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: michaelm (not logged in) ( )
Date: November 28, 2014 06:04PM

It is not a stretch to think that Drake's expedition saw the Rocky Mountain elk for the first time and thought the herd was horses. Hunters have killed people's horses thinking they are elk.
http://www.apnewsarchive.com/1991/Elk-Hunter-Shoots-Horse-by-Mistaken/id-b6a1a5e1278f5ed3a8d1c19fda330c22

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: SL Cabbie ( )
Date: November 29, 2014 07:31AM

Okay, I'm a nitpicker; they would've been Roosevelt Elk. They are slightly larger.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roosevelt_elk

I've seen herds of them several times driving up the Pacific Coast, and sailors wouldn't have exactly been naturalists.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: michaelm (not logged in) ( )
Date: November 29, 2014 09:42AM

Mormons like Old Gramps try to argue that Drake's voyage is proof but a crucial fact is ignored. Those reports from early voyages embellished the animals and often gave unreal descriptions.

The actual spread of horses into North America has been very well documented and sightings in Oregon that early just don't fit the facts. These three publications provide some of the best sources.

The Influence of the Horse in the Development of Plains Culture
http://archive.org/stream/americananthropo16ameruoft#page/n7/mode/2up

Where did the Plains Indians get their Horses
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/aa.1938.40.1.02a00110/pdf

The Northward Spread of Horses Among the Plains Indians
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/aa.1938.40.3.02a00060/pdf

It is very unlikely that Drake's sailors saw horses. The most probable answer is that they saw elk and thought they were horses.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Heartless ( )
Date: November 28, 2014 06:28PM

First, we are not sure just how far up the coast Drake made it.

There were six recorded Spanish expeditions from 1531 to 1546, any of which could have lost horses.

That does not take into consideration ship wrecks or expeditions not recorded.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: donbagley ( )
Date: November 28, 2014 06:55PM

It felt good to be out of the rain.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/28/2014 06:56PM by donbagley.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: ConcernedCitizen ( )
Date: November 28, 2014 07:01PM


Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Shummy ( )
Date: November 28, 2014 07:11PM

Ghost riders in the sky over Orem......

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMM3MgS4yxc



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/28/2014 07:13PM by Shummy.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: reuben ( )
Date: November 29, 2014 07:44AM

Occhams razor says Drake was full of shit. He was exaggerating his find (as all explorers tend to do)

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: ipseego" ( )
Date: November 29, 2014 08:03AM

If he saw them OFF the coast it would have to be walruses - "whale-horses".

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: seekyr ( )
Date: November 29, 2014 01:25PM

"The late greatly esteemed Oregonian, Thomas Condon, Ph.D. of the State University at Eugene, has furnished us a most interesting description of the very ancient progenitors of the present native Oregon horse the cayuse in his charming book, "The Two Islands and What Came of Them," (printed by the Irwin-Hodson Co. and published by the J. K. Gill Co., of Port- land), which seems fully to explain why Drake found native
horses in California."
http://archive.org/stream/questiondidsirfr00breriala/questiondidsirfr00breriala_djvu.txt

So the "cayuse" was basically a feral horse, as others have mentioned.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Ihidmyself ( )
Date: November 29, 2014 01:47PM

the Americas were in 1493 when some horses escaped from the Spaniards who brought them. Let's say it was twenty horses, possibly many more when you consider all the explorers who came to the Americans during that time. If you assume the herd doubles in size every three years (a mare can breed every year), and you assume maybe 42 years before many horses were seen in Oregon then you are talking 10 times 2 times 2 times 2 etc. fourteen times or 163,840 horses. Doesn't sound so implausible now. Also, its kind of a moot point. The western american feral horses' dna has been tested and positively shown to be descended from Spanish horses. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_horse

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Free Man ( )
Date: November 29, 2014 01:38PM

Dang, guess I'll have to go back to church then........NOT!

Fortunately I don't care to debate every little point of history or doctrine. Even if the church is true, it would be hell going to the CK.

So I'm just going to avoid it.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Shummy ( )
Date: November 29, 2014 01:56PM

>The first equid fossil was found in the gypsum quarries in Montmartre, Paris in the 1820s. The tooth was sent to the Paris Conservatory, where it was identified by Georges Cuvier, who identified it as a browsing equine ....

related to the tapir.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Ian ( )
Date: March 13, 2019 11:05AM

1540 Francisco Coronado took 556 stallions and geldings and 2 mares into the American South West. High attrition rate numbers not known.
1519 Hernan Cortez 16 Horses 6 were mares. Landed at Cozumel, Yucatan. They were valued at 400 to 500 gold pieces, it is not known how many died but scarcity pushed the price up to 900 gold pieces. Very valuable and well guarded no strays
1528 Panfilo de Alvarez landed in Florida with 42 Horses 41 were killed in battle or eaten.
1541 Hernando de Soto landed in Florida 223 Horses after 3 years only 22 were alive. By the time of departure 4 stallions were left behind. They watched from their ships as the Indians slaughtered them.
Actun Chektaleh horse bones closer examination by paleontologist Edward D. Cope gave a classification of the extinct E. conversidens (YUKON HORSE), only known in central Mexico and North America and only as fossils. However, according to Cope, Mercer’s finds were unfossilized at a depth of 1 foot (30cm).

Mayapan cenote (Natural pit or sink hole) horse teeth and bones found with pre Columbian potsherds classified as E. occidentalis (MEXICAN HORSE), and E. conversidens, (YUKON HORSE), similar to Mercer’s finds at Actun Chektaleh.
2012 Wade Miller and Steven Jones paper on horse bone dating- Pratt cave El Paso Texas 6020 to 5890 BC, Horse Thief cave Wyoming 1100 BC, Wolf Spider cave Colorado 1260-1400 AD. Accelerator Mass Spectrometry method of dating.
El Toro Yucatan I, II, III, IV Maya Classic and Preclassic ceramics V, VI Maya Classic and Preclassic ceramics, horse bone fragments (88cms) VII Mainly Preclassic ceramics, horse bones, and 3 bison bone fragments Potsherds VIII Stone tools, many horse remains 1805 BC + or –150 years (155cms) IX Few horse bones, horse bones Tephra from a volcanic eruption in the Antilles estimated 26,000 BC warm, dry grassland. El Túnel Yucatan
I, II, III, IV Maya Classic and Preclassic ceramics.
V, VI Manmade artefacts Ceramics
VII Manmade artefacts, Pleistocene bones, including 59 horse bone fragments 1850 BC+ or -150 years.
VIII, IX. (155cms)
X Mastodon bones. XI Volcanic ash. XII Pleistocene animal remains, no manmade artefacts warm, wet, deciduous jungle. XIII warm, dry, open savannah
Schmidt’s 1988 report identified these as (WESTERN HORSE) and (MEXICAN HORSE), fragments. (Supposedly extinct).

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: mikemitchell ( )
Date: March 13, 2019 11:38AM

Looks like you are saying that no stray horses could have gotten away from the Spaniards and became the North American wild horse. Some Mormons claim that but it just doesn't match the truth. Here are a couple of better sources.

Where did the Plains Indians get their Horses
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/aa.1938.40.1.02a00110/pdf

The Northward Spread of Horses Among the Plains Indians
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/aa.1938.40.3.02a00060/pdf

As for Stephen Jones and Wade Miller, Jones is proven to be unreliable in his claims. Miller did not publish any of his alleged findings in any professional journals of science. Instead he published a book marketed to LDS members, influencing them to believe that evidence exists, but that evidence was not submitted for peer review. Many of the claims are quite easily refuted. It is best to be very skeptical of anything on Book of Mormon horses published by Mormons to LDS audiences.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: GNPE ( )
Date: March 13, 2019 12:12PM

Do we know where & when horses FIRST were seen in the freakin' World?


Maybe Adam & Eve left the garden on a couple of them, te he

Options: ReplyQuote
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In


Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed. Please start another thread and continue the conversation.