Recovery Board  : RfM
Recovery from Mormonism (RfM) discussion forum. 
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Posted by: thedesertrat1 ( )
Date: September 11, 2020 09:36PM

Keep it to yourself
You never let them know what you really think.
Tell them what they want to hear.

Boundaries
Always establish boundaries when you meet someone new.
Say I think I am happy to meet you. However I am a great believer in not invading boundaries. So I always ask a couple of questions whenever I meet someone of the opposite sex.
Are you married?
Are you in a committed relationship with another human being?
These two questions will set the stage for a positive acquaintance ship. With the asking of these two questions everyone knows where everyone stands.
Also we must be careful to not invade the privacy of another human being nor violate a confidence.
It is very important that confidential meetings or interviews or interviews be documented so that there can never be a misunderstanding about the subject matter covered.
It will be important when church meetings are resumed that I always have my tape recorder with me.(mobile phone-record)
“I do not participate in undocumented interviews”!

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Nightingale ( )
Date: September 17, 2020 03:05PM

thedesertrat1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Say I think I am happy to meet you.

I tend to go without the qualifier "think". I just go for it - happy to meet until proven otherwise.


> However I am a
> great believer in not invading boundaries. So I
> always ask a couple of questions whenever I meet
> someone of the opposite sex.
> Are you married?
> Are you in a committed relationship with another
> human being?

I appreciate the respect for boundaries. But upon just meeting someone I would find the two questions to be quite abrupt. I guess it depends on the details - who are you, why are you meeting, etc.


> It will be important when church meetings are
> resumed that I always have my tape recorder with
> me.(mobile phone-record)

Are you planning on attending meetings again? As for me - not!

I'm not sure about the legality of taping people unless you have permission. I can't see church officials giving the go-ahead for that. What would be your reasoning there?

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: iceman9090 ( )
Date: September 17, 2020 03:12PM

+Nightingale:
"I'm not sure about the legality of taping people unless you have permission. I can't see church officials giving the go-ahead for that. What would be your reasoning there?"

==We aren't recording the voices of individuals.
We are recording the voices of a church and a church is not a human being. It is just a collection of claims.
We are just doing data extraction from an entity called "the church".
We then spread the information around for others to learn from it.

^^^^^That would be my response.

~~~~iceman9090

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: thedesertrat1 ( )
Date: September 17, 2020 03:26PM

Nightingale Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> thedesertrat1 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Say I think I am happy to meet you.
>
> I tend to go without the qualifier "think". I just
> go for it - happy to meet until proven otherwise.
>
>
> > However I am a
> > great believer in not invading boundaries. So I
> > always ask a couple of questions whenever I
> meet
> > someone of the opposite sex.
> > Are you married?
> > Are you in a committed relationship with
> another
> > human being?
>
> I appreciate the respect for boundaries. But upon
> just meeting someone I would find the two
> questions to be quite abrupt. I guess it depends
> on the details - who are you, why are you meeting,
> etc.
>
>
> > It will be important when church meetings are
> > resumed that I always have my tape recorder
> with
> > me.(mobile phone-record)
>
> Are you planning on attending meetings again? As
> for me - not!
Due to my living arrangements I will be obligated to attend
>
> I'm not sure about the legality of taping people
> unless you have permission. I can't see church
> officials giving the go-ahead for that. What would
> be your reasoning there?
If it is recorded it is difficult to deny. I do not participate in undocumented interviews. If the interviewer declines the recording I decline the interview.
About meetings: public gatherings may be legally recorded

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Nightingale ( )
Date: September 17, 2020 03:30PM

>If it is recorded it is difficult to deny.

Some people manage it! (I can't say here the well-known name I am thinking of but maybe you can guess). :)

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Lot's Wife ( )
Date: September 17, 2020 04:30PM

Just remember that what you are seeing is not what's happening.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Nightingale ( )
Date: September 17, 2020 04:50PM

LOL

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: thedesertrat1 ( )
Date: September 17, 2020 03:18PM

My understanding is that any public meeting may be legally taped.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Lot's Wife ( )
Date: September 17, 2020 03:19PM

Generally true.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: elderolddog ( )
Date: September 17, 2020 03:39PM

I politely ask if I can frisk'em; it gives me insights that are hard to get otherwise. Plus you can suss out the ticklish ones...

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Devoted Exmo ( )
Date: September 17, 2020 03:41PM

You must not be a star. If you're a star, they'll just let you grab 'em.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: elderolddog ( )
Date: September 17, 2020 04:18PM

Yay! Saucie thinks I'm a star! But then, I think she's one, too! ... three...

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Elder Berry ( )
Date: September 17, 2020 04:55PM

She's got you trumped.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: sd ( )
Date: September 17, 2020 04:17PM

honesty and motives. They can always lie and not care if you prove it later with a recording.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: elderolddog ( )
Date: September 17, 2020 04:27PM

This reminds me...

A currently incumbent president (I'm not naming names or pointing figures) was revealed to have hung framed and tastefully lighted copies of his "Time Magazine Man of the Year" award cover photos on the walls of golf course clubhouses he owns. Nothing garish; no neon lights, no flashing lightning bolts...

Except that this anonymous individual was never given that award by Time Magazine. An obvious error that was dutifully corrected.

What's the big deal?

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: ufotofu ( )
Date: September 18, 2020 01:16AM

Boundaries? These questions seem to be out of bounds. Because they couldn't just keep it to themselves.

Options: ReplyQuote
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In


Screen Name: 
Your Email (optional): 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **   ******   **          ******   ******** 
 **     **  **    **  **    **   **    **  **       
 **     **  **        **    **   **        **       
 *********  **        **    **   **        ******   
 **     **  **        *********  **        **       
 **     **  **    **        **   **    **  **       
 **     **   ******         **    ******   ********