Posted by:
smirkorama
(
)
Date: January 24, 2018 12:49PM
ificouldhietokolob Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> isthechurchtrue Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Here we go again with the childish responses...
Most correct thing that ITCT had said, (much more correct than his prior comments on the New Testament, which was an easy new level of improved correctness to achieve since ITCT's previous comments on the NT had a huge flaw, that was then duly exposed by you, IICHTK) .....because right after that ITCT issued warning then came along the (HIS) "childish response", just like ITCT had warned !!!!
....Thanks for the warning, ITCT !!!
>
> If you're referring to my post, it wasn't
> childish.
> If you're referring to the post under mine...yeah,
> I agree.
Funny dang thing, the post under your post is still 80 percent yours (IICHTK's) by word count.
..... and IF saying that (dead wood)Jesus has disappeared for a long time so much like the golden plates have disappeared is childish, then what else is childish (or childishly accurate) too?
The SLA BAM BAAAA comment was a simple (supportive) observation about the brutal, not very childlike, fact based take down that was executed on ITCT's prior errant comments.... a take down that was then RE executed in your follow up post ......to which I again respond to by saying SLA BAM BAAAA!!! as in brutal take down. are you,IICHTK,suddenly going to be "childish" enough as in silly enough to say that is not what happened ?
> OK. It's more than a bit of a stretch to say Paul
> giving instructions on which people can teach (for
> example) is "about Jesus." Wouldn't you agree?
SLAAA BAM BAAAAAA!!!
> Well, other than perhaps Paul, almost none of the NT was
> written by "apostles."
Actually, strictly by word count and author attribution, a significant part of the NT WAS written by Apostles, SO you blew it on that one by being incorrect!!!! but I will not be too hard on you for that, because as the fact that much of the first 3 NT gospels are nearly identical and the fourth is quite similar, there is a redundancy of that content which considerably reduces its practical whole. But "None" is still way too extreme in describing the deal. As the legitimacy of Paul as an apostle is question, (even as they are ALL mythical characters) then apostle created NT content is again considerably diminished.
Best of all, it is apparent that you have mentally segregated the NT into content actually about Christ versus every thing else, which is one of the best (as in most valid) distinctions of the NT of all, even if you bumbled a little bit in attempting to state it, that after you so very effectively demolishing ITCT's errant commentary.
....I hope those observations are NOT too "childish" (accurate) for you ( the master wielder of facts) to take.