Posted by:
Henry Bemis
(
)
Date: September 10, 2018 02:27PM
Cheryl: I do not know your story, and never claimed to know it. But even now you are vague about the process of your resignation. But whatever it was, I will gladly acknowledge your courage, and retract any impression I left otherwise. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that whatever the process was, it was right for you and your family.
But, what I will not acknowledge is the absolute falsity of your arguments in the other post. That is what I challenged. When you suggest that formally resigning from Mormonism is irrelevant or unnecessary; or worse somehow gives in to Mormon authority, I take issue. Such a stance encourages people to postpone, or set-aside, the general moral mandate to disassociate oneself with false and immoral organizations.
The reality is that you are either a member of the Church or you are not. There is not a lot of gray area. That determination is made by the social, cultural, and legal standards that are in place as related to that organization. In this case, "resigning" means formal resignation.
As we all know from this Board, formally resigning from Mormonism is often a difficult, challenging, and sometimes life changing action. People are naturally looking for reasons not to do it, or to postpone it; for the sake of the kids, the marriage, the parents, or whatever. Without setting myself up as a moral authority in every situation and context, I would suggest a simple moral default position; if you discover that you are a member of an organization that is false and immoral, you should do whatever is necessary to distance yourself from it; i.e. by resigning--formally and definitively. Any facts or circumstances that suggest contrary actions should be evaluated very carefully, and not cavalierly invoked for the sake of convenience, or especially by kidding oneself into thinking that it doesn't really matter, or that the moral high ground is somehow served by resisting formal resignation. In my view, your arguments in the other post presented precisely the wrong impression on this issue, which is why I spent so much time refuting it.
That is all I have on this topic. I wish you the best.