Posted by:
Lot's Wife
(
)
Date: May 09, 2019 12:49PM
Pope Francis just announced a new policy on child molestation. The press is describing this as a rule requiring priests and nuns to report abuse, which sounds great. And it is great. Francis has been in his post for six years, so the promulgation of the new policy is long overdue. But this is an unprecedented and impressive step.
Conversely, the press is overstating the magnitude of the change. What the policy actually says is that if nuns or priests have a "well-founded motive to believe" that someone has abused a child, s/he must report their suspicions to their superiors in the church. This is a far cry from what is needed. First, rather than requiring line workers to report any allegation of abuse, the new rule asks them initially to decide if they find the charges credible--which, of course, the clergy are not trained to do. Second, the reports will be to the priests' and nuns' superiors in the RCC, and those superiors can disregard those reports if they want. Finally, the new policy imposes no responsibility to report either actual or potential abuse to law enforcement authorities.
So what we have is a statement of intent. The church still acts as if abuse is an internal affair; it still holds itself above the law. That has to change. But for the first time the pope has stated that it intends to take child abuse seriously, which is significant progress.
It will be interesting to see how Francis's opponents in the hierarchy react to this demarche. Did early word of the new policy contribute to his enemies' decision to go public last week? Is Francis trying to act on child molestation to gain public support for his campaign against the conservatives? In short, was the new policy motivated solely by concern for children?