Posted by:
Birdman
(
)
Date: July 07, 2020 04:06PM
I’m somewhat appalled at the recent posting on this board. They are very philosophical and, in most cases, erudite. However, in my mind these arguments represent almost a pathological denial of most of our pasts. Presumptively most of us have a Mormon connection in our past.
I may be mistaken but I don’t think anyone was converted to Mormonism by empirical reasoning but were converted by testimonial evidence and/or spiritism. Taking these arguments out of the philosophical and squarely acknowledging that people lie and that the best defense against lying is empirical evidence as opposed to the other alternatives. Yes, you can be deceived in any number of ways. Ironically, you be deceived by empirical evidence, possibly for two hundred years until the technology is achieved that can invalidate an erroneous presumption. However, assuming that the idea of a Christian God dates back approximately 6,000 years there is no more evidence for his existence now then there was when the idea was first introduced.