https://www.einstein-online.info/en/spotlight/the-singularity-theorem/

Roger Penrose won a Nobel Prize for his (and Hawking’s) Black Hole Singularity Theorem.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose%E2%80%93Hawking_singularity_theorems#:~:text=Penrose%20was%20awarded%20the%20Nobel,Reinhard%20Genzel%20and%20Andrea%20Ghez.


Does that mean they’re real?

Insufficient documentation...

Who knows?

elderolddog Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Insufficient documentation...
>
> Who knows?

Roger Penrose, who won a Nobel Prize for the theorems named after him and Hawking, the PenroseHawing Theorems of Black Hole Singularity, which they published 50 yrs ago, which proved mathematically, what Einstein predicted 50yrs prior to that, with his theory of general relativity.

It wasn’t until we observed a black hole that it was proven.
But nobody has seen singularity, because it is hidden inside of the black hole’s event horizon or before the beginning of time and space.

But now that we’ve seen black holes and Penrose proved mathematically, that black holes must contain singularity, just like Theory of Relativity predicted, that settles it.

Except for the paradox that the singularity is a point of infinite density and infinite mass, where the theory of relativity no longer applies, which means it must be incomplete.
There has to be a better theory. A theory of Quantum Gravity would explain it.

https://www.einstein-online.info/en/explandict/singularity/

I know it's silly in retrospect, but in the late 50s or early 60s, it was mathematically proven that humans would never be able to exceed 200 mph from a standing start in a quarter mile, using reciprocating engines.

I simply don't believe human science is capable of defining limits to theoretical propositions.

I must be flawed...

First, what' with the "the"? There are apparently billions of singularities.

And do singularities believe in us? I'd be bummed if they did not recognize our magnificence,

I clicked the links, read parts of each, and I can honestly say that I don't have any clue as to what this means or what I believe anymore. I'm stymied.

But, not to let this log-in go to waste, I will include my favorite pancake recipe:

2 cups all purpose pancake mix
1-3/4 cups water
Stir, but not too much
Pour large spoonful onto hot greased skillet
Cook 90 seconds and flip over
Enjoy

Brilliant!

thx sunbeep ~ ~



will try ~

I thought this was about the technorapture

Is the "singularity" that new thong garment?

Asking for a friend.

briantchrist is confusing singularity with slingshot ~



https://youtu.be/skNMYSYiM54



plz stay on topic brian ~


thx ~

Hey, the philistines laughed at David's slingshot too.

Thong thung blue . . .

If you believe we are magic...to singularity you must pray.

>> Do you believe in the Singularity? <<

Do I need to?

Don't you have a strange attraction to it?

I have a great attraction to it!

Now excuse me with I find some click bait to post to make me look intelligent.

Roy G Biv Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I have a great attraction to it!

Sir, you outdo yourself.

I believe in the duality.

What is a white hole? well, maybe this universe we live in is a white hole. Maybe that's how it was born: down a black hole in a universe one tier up from this one. IF this is so, a black hole would suck in information, break it down to its constituent wave-function virtual particles and energy, and then spit it out in a space-time pocket separate from the rest of the afore-mentioned universe. Another way of saying: the cosmic horizon in our universe is what the event horizon of black hole looks like on the inside. I like this theory.

That's the shit.