Posted by:
Brother Of Jerry
(
)
Date: November 05, 2010 03:24PM
Mormons were of course borderline socialist/communitarian back in the United Order days. There was pretty substantial political diversity well into the 20th century. FDR carried Utah. Even into the second half of the 20th century, people like Wayne Owens, Frank Moss, Cal Rampton, and Scott Matheson (Jim's father), won elections.
Not so much, any more. I get the feeling that things changed in the 1950s when people like ETB and Joseph Fielding Smith were running the church, and rising to top leadership positions. The liberal phase was in the 1940s and 1950s and early 60s under McKay, Brown, Tanner, Lowell Bennion, and earlier, people like BH Roberts, Talmadge, and others who were not, shall I say, like JFS.
The Civil Rights movement starting in the 1950s (Brown v Board of Education, 1954), and the civil liberties of the 1960s, the relaxing of many restirctions during the 1960s, most especially sexual restrictions, drove LDS Inc up the wall. LDS Inc is nothing if not authoritarian. Democrats were not authoritarian, but there was a wing of the Republican Party that became seriously authoritarian. The Mormon hierarchy liked that, and the sheeple followed.
Interestingly, the Tea Party movement does not seem to be particularly authoritarian. The religionist wing of the party has pretty much taken a back seat this last election. Things could well change again, but right now, right wing authoritarianism is not resonating the way it used to.
At least that's how it looks to me. I'm not sure how that will affect Mormonism. I do know that in the 1960s, when I came of age, Utah was perceived as conservative, and a little weird, but it was not perceived as the reddest of red states. (Nor was that terminology used then. Red used to be waaay bad. Better Dead than Red)