Posted by:
tmtinfw
(
)
Date: November 23, 2010 10:12AM
A similar thought occurred to me while reading a recent post regarding the 1000-year-old folks living on the moon.
http://exmormon.org/phorum/read.php?2,38505This absurd claim spurred a number of questions in my mind:
1. Am I justified in disregarding this claim because it was published in the 19th century?
2. Should I disregard this claim because it was not written in an "official church publication?"
3. If disregarding this claim because of age, at what point in time ought I begin to regard claims with full confidence?
4. Since this claim (and others in this article) appear to have been debunked, which other 19th century claims are also untrue, and what is the method for determining veracity of those claims?
5. Does it fall upon me to pray for a confirmation regarding the veracity of all teachings found in church publications? Shouldn't I have complete faith in whichever publication has been provided by the church?
6. Are all claims published before the advent of "correlation" subject to error? If so, which ones?
What are the chances any of these questions might be addressed during an upcoming General Conference?