Posted by:
DNA
(
)
Date: January 17, 2011 01:05PM
There are so many variables to this. The one that will probably be loudly proclaimed is that the boy is Satan's spawn, and the girl will never have a normal life. Both ideas are too simplistic.
Not all abuse is the same. If this girl is having a hard time dealing with it a decade later, then it is certainly a big problem, but could be more from the damage that the parents caused, than the brother.
Like most things, sexual contact as a child is on a continuum, with one side of the continuum not damaging at all, and the other side horrifically damaging. And there are a thousand points in between.
If the contact is unwanted, it's gets worse on the continuum. If force is used, it's worse. The larger the power difference is, the worse it is. The more it is shammed, the worse it is. Make it have to be a family secret, the worse the shame is, etc. All those types of variables help decide where on the continuum of not damaging, to horrifically damaging it falls.
Believe it or not, most people have sexual contact as a child that is not damaging. For some it is called, "playing doctor" or "I'll show you mine if you show me yours." It is normal and is generally not damaging at all, unless caught by an adult and shamed.
When there isn't force or coercion, just mutual curiosity, it's usually not a big deal at all.
Have one person want to do it, and the other not want to, and it gets into a problem area. Have one protest, and the other force it, and it becomes worse. Physical pain makes it worse, threats make it worse Etc.
Shame is also one of the very damaging components. Take for example just a friendly game of playing doctor. It likely has no harm at all. Now have a parent walk in and find out, yell and make a huge issue out of it, spank the child and shame them, then it does become damaging.
Even an older child to a younger child doesn't necessarily have to be a horrible, and take decades to recover from sort of thing; depending of course on what exactly happened, and how it was dealt with.
So we don't know what happened to this girl, and where on the continuum it falls, though some will act like it is all one thing, and is the same thing that they experienced.
If the girl was shamed (very likely from the description) wasn't listened to, told to keep it in and never talk about it, that in itself will cause harm. Family secrets suck for the victim.
If it had been reported at the time, the brother would have likely been removed from the home, even if the sexual contact was on the not damaging end of the scale. More shame, more guilt for the "victim" and a huge problem in the family.
If he was a brutal, forcing, inflicting physical pain and degradation type of abuser, he would likely have been removed from the home and put in Juvenile Detention. And that would have probably been best in that situation.
We don't know how old of a teen he was, and if it happened a decade ago, and the girl is now a teen, she was somewhere between 3 and 9. Was it a 9 and 13-year-old? Or a 3 and 18-year-old? Where on the scale was it for being fairly harmless, and horrifically destructive?
We can't really say what should have been done, and what should now be done, without knowing that information.
Sibling exploration doesn't necessarily mean the brother is going to be a pedophile adult now.
In many places the statute of limitations for sex crimes is X-amount of years after law enforcement learns of it. If they never heard of it, it could still be opened. If they did hear of it, it's too late now.
If it wasn't on the more harmful side of the scale, they probably won't touch it a decade later, and both people being children at the time, and with the perpetrator being an adult now. If it was on the horrific end, they may look into it, but would have to charge him as an adult of course.
I doubt that what should happen IMO, will happen.
Counseling for the girl, with a competent therapist who deals with sexual abuse issues should certainly be done. At some point, family counseling is warranted. Then family secrets and shame can be laid out and dealt with.
Depending on what the abuse was, the parents may have caused the more of the damage.
I hope for the girls sake, it was sibling experimentation that was made worse than it needed to be by the parents, not horrific and painful, forced abuse.
How the family reacts to it now will have more of an effect on how long this will take to heal probably, than the sexual contact itself will, unless it was towards the horrific side.
Even if it was on the horrific side of the scale, how the family reacts now will have a huge influence on the long term outcome.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/17/2011 01:23PM by DNA.