Recovery Board  : RfM
Recovery from Mormonism (RfM) discussion forum. 
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: December 14, 2010 04:27PM

"A New Hampshire couple has pulled their son out of his local high school after the teen was assigned a book that refers to Jesus Christ as a 'wine-guzzling vagrant and precocious socialist.'

"Aimee Taylor says her oldest son, 16-year-old Jordan Henderson, was required to read 'Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America,' this fall for Bedford High School's personal finance class. . . .

" . . . [I]n addition to taking aim at the idea of the American Dream . . ., Taylor says Ehrenreich also takes aim at Christians and other groups in the book and uses foul language--all of which made Jordan unhappy.
'He started making some comments about the book and I said, "Well, just read it. You know you have to read it for school," . . . But finally he came home one day and said "I'm not reading this book, I'm done reading this book, I am not reading any more of this book," and he slammed it down and said, "This is junk!"' . . . I finished the book that night, I could not put it down because I was just mortified by the take on this book as well as the language, and the Jesus Christian bashing was unbelievable to me, and that it was in our school was just amazing to me,' she said.

"One of the excerpts Taylor points to is Ehrenreich's description of a Christian service she attended in Maine. 'It would be nice if someone would read this sad-eyed crowd the Sermon on the Mount, accompanied by a rousing commentary on income inequality . . . . But Jesus makes his appearance here only as a corpse; the living man, the wine-guzzling vagrant and precocious socialist, is never once mentioned, nor anything he ever had to say. Christ crucified rules, and it may be that the true business of modern Christianity is to crucify him again and again so that he can never get a word out of his mouth,' Ehrenreich writes.

"Still, wanting a second opinion, Taylor says she asked her 'more lenient' husband Dennis to read the book, assuming he would tell her she was making a big deal out of nothing.
'Actually in the end he said, "This is a piece of junk, this book is garbage and does not belong in the school. . . . [T]his book should not belong in the classroom, it's really inappropriate for their age." [H]e was really upset that we weren't given notice about the book either,' Taylor said.

"The Taylors contacted the principal with their concerns. But roughly three weeks later a review committee assembled by the school district ruled that despite its shortcomings, 'the book provided valuable insight into the circumstances of the working poor and an opportunity for students to demonstrate mastery of the "Financial Impact" competency," it said in a report.

"'Even the way that they worded the letter was fascinating. The language wasn't objectionable, it wasn't that it was wrong. It was "questionable." And I thought, it's not questionable in a courthouse, if you're an attorney and you say that you're going to get kicked out by the judge,' Taylor said. '. . . These words are illegal to say on national TV and radio in this country and yet here they are in this book.'

"Assistant Superintendent Chip McGee [said that] that the district still plans to evaluate the personal finance class to see if 'Nickel and Dimed' can be replaced with a less controversial book and will require teachers to notify parents from now on before assigning the book and offer an alternative should they object.

"But Taylor says that's not enough.

"'We've eliminated Christmas, we've eliminated all these things because we don't want to step on anyone's toes but here we're going to hand out this book? . . . This is anti-God, anti-religion, it's racial, I mean it crosses a wide spectrum of very touchy and very insulting issues to most human beings and I think that even with a parental consent it's not enough. They need to boot that book out of there,' Taylor said.

"The Taylors, who have since begun home schooling their son at his request, plan to attend the Dec. 13 Bedford School Board meeting to ask that the book be yanked entirely so taxpayers are no longer forced to pay for it. . . ."

("Parents Pull Son Out of New Hampshire School Over Assigned Book That Refers to Jesus as 'Wine-Guzzling Vagrant and Socialist,"' by Diane Macedo, FoxNews.com, at:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/12/07/nh-school-assigns-book-refers-jesus-wine-guzzling-vagrant-precocious-socialist/)

*****

Wow.

It's interesting that these high-minded high school parents want this book banned for what they consider its inappropriate language and over-the-line depictions of Jesus, but using that argument, why not then ban from critical academic examination the Bible itself as (if nothing else) a notable piece of human literature that goes after non-Christians guns a-blazin,' given that its narratives depict its Jesus figure as engaging in inhumane, inappropriate, demeaning and immoral activities that include making full-scale frontal verbal assaults on non-believers (attacks that, by the way, those who are not Bible boosters might understandably find offensive)?

Points to consider in examining the life and "example" of the Bible's Jesus character:

"WAS JESUS PEACEABLE AND COMPASSIONATE?

"The birth of Jesus was heralded with "Peace on Earth," yet Jesus said, 'Think not that I am come to send peace: I came not to send peace but a sword.' (Matthew 10:34) 'He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.' (Luke 22:36) 'But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.' (Luke 19:27. In a parable, but spoken of favorably.)

"The burning of unbelievers during the Inquisition was based on the words of Jesus: 'If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned.' (John 15:6)

"Jesus looked at his critics 'with anger' (Mark 3:5), and attacked merchants with a whip (John 2:15). He showed his respect for life by drowning innocent animals (Matthew 8:32). He refused to heal a sick child until he was pressured by the mother (Matthew 15:22-28).

"The most revealing aspect of his character was his promotion of eternal torment. 'The Son of man [Jesus himself] shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.' (Matthew 13:41-42) 'And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched.' (Mark 9:43)

"Is this nice? Is it exemplary to make your point with threats of violence? Is hell a kind, peaceful idea?


"DID JESUS PROMOTE "FAMILY VALUES"?

"'If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.' (Luke 14:26)

"'I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.' (Matthew 10:35-36)

"When one of his disciples requested time off for his father's funeral, Jesus rebuked him: 'Let the dead bury their dead.' (Matthew 8:22)

"Jesus never used the word 'family.' He never married or fathered children. To his own mother, he said, 'Woman, what have I to do with thee?' (John 2:4)


"WHAT WERE HIS VIEWS ON EQUALITY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE?

"Jesus encouraged the beating of slaves: 'And that servant [slave], which knew his lord's will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes.' (Luke 12:47) He never denounced servitude, incorporating the master-slave relationship into many of his parables.

"He did nothing to alleviate poverty. Rather than sell some expensive ointment to help the poor, Jesus wasted it on himself, saying, 'Ye have the poor with you always.' (Mark 14:3-7)

"No women were chosen as disciples or invited to the Last Supper.


"WHAT MORAL ADVICE DID JESUS GIVE?

"'There be eunuchs which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.' (Matthew 19:12) Some believers, including church father Origen, took this verse literally and castrated themselves. Even metaphorically, this advice is in poor taste.

"If you do something wrong with your eye or hand, cut/pluck it off (Matthew 5:29-30, in a sexual context).

"Marrying a divorced woman is adultery. (Matthew 5:32)

"Don't plan for the future. (Matthew 6:34)

"Don't save money. (Matthew 6:19-20)

"Don't become wealthy. (Mark 10:21-25)

"Sell everything and give it to the poor. (Luke 12:33)

"Don't work to obtain food. (John 6:27)

"Don't have sexual urges. (Matthew 5:28)

"Make people want to persecute you. (Matthew 5:11)
Let everyone know you are better than the rest. (Matthew 5:13-16)

"Take money from those who have no savings and give it to rich investors. (Luke 19:23-26)

"If someone steals from you, don't try to get it back. (Luke 6:30)

"If someone hits you, invite them to do it again. (Matthew 5:39)

"If you lose a lawsuit, give more than the judgment. (Matthew 5:40)

"If someone forces you to walk a mile, walk two miles. (Matthew 5:41)

"If anyone asks you for anything, give it to them without question. (Matthew 5:42)

"Is this wise? Is this what you would teach your children?


"WAS JESUS RELIABLE?

"Jesus told his disciples that they would not die before his second coming: 'There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom' (Matthew 16:28). 'Behold, I come quickly.' (Revelation 3:11) It's been 2,000 years, and believers are still waiting for his 'quick' return.

"He mistakenly claimed that the mustard seed is 'the least of all seeds' (Matt. 13:32), and that salt could 'lose its savour' (Matthew 5:13).

"Jesus said that whoever calls somebody a 'fool' shall be in danger of hell fire (Matthew 5:22), yet he called people 'fools' himself (Matthew 23:17).

"Regarding his own truthfulness, Jesus gave two conflicting opinions: 'If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true' (John 5:31), and 'Though I bear record of myself, yet my record is true' (John 8:14).


"WAS JESUS A GOOD EXAMPLE?

"He irrationally cursed a fig tree for being fruitless out of season (Matthew 21:18-19, and Mark 11:13-14). He broke the law by stealing corn on the Sabbath (Mark 2:23), and he encouraged his disciples to take a horse without asking permission (Matthew 21).

"The 'humble' Jesus said that he was 'greater than the temple' (Matt 12:6), 'greater than Jonah' (Matthew 12:41), and 'greater than Solomon' (Matthew 12:42). He appeared to suffer from a dictator's 'paranoia' when he said, 'He that is not with me is against me' (Matthew 12:30).


"WHY JESUS?

"Although other verses can be cited that portray Jesus in a different light, they do not erase the disturbing side of his character. The conflicting passages, however, prove that the New Testament is contradictory.

"The 'Golden Rule' had been said many times by earlier religious leaders. (Confucius: 'Do not unto others that you would not have them do unto you.') 'Turn the other cheek' encourages victims to invite further violence. 'Love thy neighbor' applied only to fellow believers. (Neither the Jews nor Jesus showed much love to foreign religions). A few of the Beatitudes ('Blessed are the peacemakers') are acceptable, but they are all conditions of future reward, not based on respect for human life or values.

"On the whole, Jesus said little that was worthwhile. He introduced nothing new to ethics (except hell). He instituted no social programs. Being 'omniscient,' he could have shared some useful science or medicine, but he appeared ignorant of such things (as if his character were merely the invention of writers stuck in the first century).

"Many scholars are doubtful of the historical existence of Jesus. Albert Schweitzer said, 'The historical Jesus will be to our time a stranger and an enigma.' No first-century writer confirms the Jesus story. The New Testament is internally contradictory and contains historical errors. The story is filled with miracles and other outrageous claims. Consisting mostly of material borrowed from pagan religions, the Jesus story appears to be cut from the same fabric as all other myths and fables.

"Why is Jesus so special? It would be more reasonable and productive to emulate real, flesh-and-blood human beings who have contributed to humanity--mothers who have given birth, scientists who have alleviated suffering, social reformers who have fought injustice--than to worship a character of such dubious qualities as Jesus."
_____


**In response to criticism of the above indictment of the Biblical Jesus character, this paranthetical note was added:

"I realize that I am treating the New Testament flatly, as if all of the words and deeds of Jesus can be taken at face value. I know there is controversy regarding the authenticity of many of the verses quoted above.

"'The Jesus Seminar,' for example, concludes that approximately 85% of the words and actions of Jesus as reported in the New Testament are not authentic -- he never said or did most of those things. This [treatment, however] is aimed at the 'bible believer' who thinks the entire New Testament is inerrant and inspired.

" . . . I have received numerous complaints that I have taken many of these verses "out of context." In one admitted sense (as noted in the paragraph above) that may be true -- in the context of current historical biblical scholarship, most of those verses can be thrown out of the New Testament.

"But in the other sense (the sense intended by the fundamentalists and evangelicals who think I am misrepresenting Jesus), I am taking nothing out of context. None of those who have accused me of 'out of context' have given a specific example, or have explained the "context" to which they refer, or the meanings of the words of the writers or their intended readers that would differ from the face value of the text."

("Why Jesus?," "Nontract #12," Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, at: http://ffrf.org/publications/nontracts/Why-Jesus/)

Heh. As they say, what's good for the god is good for the gander.

:)



Edited 14 time(s). Last edit at 12/14/2010 05:34PM by steve benson.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: wine country girl ( )
Date: December 14, 2010 04:35PM

*Nickel and Dimed

And this excerpt: "It would be nice if someone would read this sad-eyed crowd the Sermon on the Mount, accompanied by a rousing commentary on income inequality . . . . But Jesus makes his appearance here only as a corpse; the living man, the wine-guzzling vagrant and precocious socialist, is never once mentioned, nor anything he ever had to say. Christ crucified rules, and it may be that the true business of modern Christianity is to crucify him again and again so that he can never get a word out of his mouth," honors Jesus, the man. (yadda yadda yadda, if he existed at all)



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 12/14/2010 04:52PM by wine country girl.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: wine country girl ( )
Date: December 14, 2010 04:50PM


Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 12/14/2010 04:52PM by wine country girl.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: geneticerror ( )
Date: December 14, 2010 04:57PM

I read it too. In my opinion it should be mandatory reading in a personal finance class. It was indeed very enlightening. Since then I do not take my frustrations out on the clerk, waitress, or laborer. I always tipped my servers but now I leave at least 20%. It's the least I can do to help a person who is working their ass off for close to nothing in return.

Despite how these particular fanatics choose to interpret this book it's a stretch to claim that this book is anti-religion.

I saw this story a couple of days ago and I thought the same thing that Steve did. Why don't they protest the bible if they truly object to the language, violence, and sex content? I suspect they have not read the bible either. Perhaps they have 'read' it but they certainly didn't understand it.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Adult of god ( )
Date: December 14, 2010 04:58PM

to what major corporations have done to wages, i.e. the world he's growing up in. Let's hope his home schooling leads him to a job that never, never lets him get laid off, or fired, or goes the way of the buggy whip.

As for his mother? She lets the cat out of the bag by foaming about "eliminating Christmas." Christmas certainly seems to be still with us and starts before Halloween these days. What she is talking about is saying Happy Holidays so Jews, Muslim, and Kwansans are included. They are also celebrating the season.

Jordan will grow up to be a good little follower.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/14/2010 04:59PM by Adult of god.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: anagrammy ( )
Date: December 15, 2010 11:13AM

without being able to derive benefit from material which includes words/concepts which differ from his family's paradigm. She is teaching him that deviating from Jesus-worship makes the sum of a person and their POV worthless.

This will not work well when he's in college studying evolution. Or when he gets into the business world and has to analyze reports which contain assumptions off his map.

Also, allowing him to be home schooled at his request sends the message that he is the center of the universe and everything he hears and sees should agree with his assumptions, i.e., be perfumed. The is narcissistic and unrealistic.

Such children go forth into the world entirely unprepared to deal with other religions, such as the one we're at war with right now, who take great offense at the placing of a boot on sacred soil. We say, "Balderdash--that's nonsense" because that's what WE believe, having no respect for the beliefs of others.

The first step in respect is to allow others to print what they think and to teach our children to respect the views of others. Shame on her.


Anagrammy

PS. I homeschooled for a while myself and saw that it resulted in lack of study skills and self-discipline, whereas they certainly performed well on tests. Homeschooling mothers like to Waldorf it--ie, follow your child's interests and they don't really have homework with a deadline. Just yesterday my daughter told me how much trouble this is causing her with time management in college.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Suckafoo ( )
Date: December 15, 2010 06:06AM

The message Jesus conveys as a whole is that in order for a person to follow Christ you must be willing to sacrifice it all: family, fortune, dignity, respect. It's an all or nothing deal. He who loses their life shall find it which lends to the idea that some may have done that successfully. He came to stir things up and he did. Most people on this planet have faith in a higher power of some kind which should make one think a bit about what is within many of us which longs to believe in something or someone they cannot see. The nature of many a man fights against the idea of no God and is not a natural way of thinking for many. Some people, out of fear, strike back against what they perceive as an effort to remove or taint their faith, and arranging facts in such a way as to misrepresent it's original meaning. Their intent is often good hearted.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: OnceMore ( )
Date: December 15, 2010 10:42AM

Predictably,some self-identified "Tea Partiers" and Glenn Beck have taken up the cause.

Excerpt: "A minimal[sic] of research will reveal that the mission of the IB [International Baccalaureate] program, which schools and teachers must pledge to promote, is the UN’s mission of world government. That’s it in a nutshell. Our government schools are now promoting the UN’s agenda, even without IB, and have been for a long time. So is it any wonder that books and tests and other materials are anti-capitalism, anti-business, anti-religion, anti-borders, anti-family, and anti-sovereignty?

Source: http://www.nhteapartycoalition.org/tea/2010/12/09/nickel-and-dimed-book-is-just-the-tip-of-the-iceberg

I've read "Nickel and Dimed." It's a well-written book and accomplishes the difficult task of putting the reader into the shoes of several low-wage workers. The reader has a vicarious experience of working as house cleaner, as a maid, as a drone at Wal-Mart, etc. These are workers who earn so little money that they have to live out of their cars. A huge underclass in the USA cannot scrape together first and last month's rents (plus a security deposit) so that they can move into an apartment or even a rented room. No health care is coupled with poor diets and difficult working conditions -- a recipe for disaster. Corporate CEOs take advantage of them. "Nickel and Dimed" is a good book for high school students to read.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Human ( )
Date: December 15, 2010 11:17AM

.......I wish *someone* had the balls to horse-whip the money-changers on Wall Street. If nothing else, Christ had balls.



Nickle and Dimed is an excellent book, *especially* for High Schoolers and Christians. It's an invaluable real-world lesson for the former, and an invaluable lesson on hypocrisy for the later.

Options: ReplyQuote
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In


Screen Name: 
Your Email (optional): 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **      **  ********   **      **   ******   **     ** 
 **  **  **  **     **  **  **  **  **    **  **     ** 
 **  **  **  **     **  **  **  **  **        **     ** 
 **  **  **  ********   **  **  **  **        **     ** 
 **  **  **  **         **  **  **  **         **   **  
 **  **  **  **         **  **  **  **    **    ** **   
  ***  ***   **          ***  ***    ******      ***