Posted by:
derrida
(
)
Date: February 21, 2011 06:33PM
How far should one expect a TBM spouse to go in supporting our decision to not go to church, to not be a part of the church? What is a minimum? For instance, is it too much to ask that the TBM spouse put off baptizing one of the children, or allowing the children to stay home every other Sunday?
I know one answer I'll get to this is that "it all depends on the TBM in question." Okay, but it does seem to me that all too often, in the posts one reads, the TBM is the one calling the shots. They are the aggrieved party; you bailed on them; you don't respect their beliefs; you are the one who isn't toeing the line; the disaffected spouse is the one who lacks integrity or character or is under the influence of Satan. I guess what I'm wondering about here is what are the minimal rights that an exmo can expect from a TBM spouse?
Mormonism is so bad about boundaries that I think it's helpful to rehearse the exmo list of rights (a la what one might find in an assertiveness training manual). E.g., "I have the right to say no to love-bombing." "I have the right to not have my son's missionary farewell in my home." "I have the right to not have home teachers visit." "I have the right to take the kids to my own, non-mo church every other Sunday." Etc.