Posted by:
beulahland
(
)
Date: April 21, 2011 06:35PM
I keep hearing this from Mormons when someone leaves or expresses disinterest in the church, and it really bothers me. Not following a religion doesn't affect your ability to be a good person. It just affects your ability to follow pointless rules that have nothing to do with being a good person. I'm making a list of Mormon rules and how not believing in god affects my ability to follow them. Add on if you've got any of your own.
1. No sex before marriage. Okay, let's be honest here. MOST Mormons don't actually wait until they're married. They just say they do. So the majority of young people in the LDS faith are actually just following "No admitting you've had sex until marriage." However, waiting to have sex until you're in love and committed to someone is not strictly a religious concept. Lots of people refrain due to health risks, possibilities of getting pregnant, and due to a completely non-god related moral standard of wanting it to be special.
2. No masturbation. Okay, that one's just STUPID. This doesn't help you to lead a happy, clean, healthy life. This ensures that by the time you're ready to have sex you're probably gonna be so uncomfortable with your own body that you won't be able to enjoy it. Not even if it's with your temple-sealed spouse that you're supposed to boink for all eternity.
3. No smoking or drinking. This is a health thing, and one that many atheist follow as well. Not because they believe their body is a sacred gift from god, but because they know it's the only body they'll get and want it to last. Same goes for eating healthy. Are those health freaks that live on wheat germ and algae better people than Mormons because they take better care of their "sacred gifts from god"? And please, for the love of god, don't tell me I'm not a mormon because it's too hard. I'm not a mormon because I think it's dumb. Now if you wanna tell me I'm not a health freak who eats only raw food and runs six miles a day because it's too hard then you might be onto something. But on that note, couldn't we say that every single person on this earth that isn't a vegan is only not a vegan because it's too hard and they're not strong enough? Would anyone really argue that the conditions our food producing animals are subjected to is pretty sick and wrong? Wouldn't the world be a better place if we weren't all torturing and killing miserable little baby cows so that we could have delicious veal? But you know what? I HATE soy milk. Meat substitutes are disgusting. I love a nice steak. But if someone were to ask me if I thought it was morally acceptable to shove cows into overpacked miserable slaughterhouses and then murder them so that I could enjoy a tasty steak, I'd probably say no. Does that stop me from eating steak? Nope. So I'm not strong enough to be a vegan. Okay. I'll take it. Does that make vegans better than me? No, most of them are dicks. I suspect they're so cranky because they're hungry all the time.