Posted by:
TheIrrationalShark
(
)
Date: March 10, 2012 06:16PM
What do you guys think of the following article?
http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon/Warfare/SwordsHere's what I have to say. Here's a quote from the article:
"And now behold, my brethren, since it has been all that we could do, (as we were the most lost of all mankind) to repent of all our sins and the many murders which we have committed, and to get God to take them away from our hearts, for it was all we could do to repent sufficiently before God that he would take away our stain—Now, my best beloved brethren, since God hath taken away our stains, and our swords have become bright, then let us stain our swords no more with the blood of our brethren. Behold, I say unto you, Nay, let us retain our swords that they be not stained with the blood of our brethren; for perhaps, if we should stain our swords again they can no more be washed bright through the blood of the Son of our great God, which shall be shed for the atonement of our sins.(Alma 24:11-13)
Wiping blood from a metal blade is simple—cleaning such a weapon is no miracle. However, the wooden-hafted macuhuitl would absorb the blood, making it almost impossible to clean. The "brightness" of the sword blades matches well with obsidian fragments."
Doesn't the Book of Mormon passage sound more like a metaphore that God is forgiving them of their sins, and thus the "blood" or sin is washed away? But of course, a literal interperitation of this passage is more convenient for the apologists. If it wasn't, they'd instantly call it a metaphor.