Posted by:
JoD3:360
(
)
Date: June 06, 2012 09:29PM
One time in Seminary we were having a deep and spiritual lesson, girls were all weepy and some of us guys weren't far behind and it was very quiet as the teacher spoke. Somebody farted obviously by accident and the class broke out in the giggles, and the mood was broken.
In church and in leadership and teacher training we heard all the time about how the mood has to be set in order for the spirit to work in our teaching environment- cottage meetings should only be held in clean and well kept homes, and only certain types of music allow the spirit to be present.
Many times I have heard leaders say that the spirit has fled because of this outburst or that disordered lesson, or cluttered homes of faithful and spiritual members.
If the Holy Ghost according to mormon thought is so fragile and skittish that he will flee and leave the class to the wiles of the adversary when a kid embarrasses themselves to death in a seminary class, how can we possibly know how or if to trust it with our quest for salvation?
To me, it seems that the major fallacy of the church changing the Holy Ghost as the mind and will of God to a third disembodied personage who testifies of truth. He no longer represents the Lord in all of its driving force and bravery, but to simply reassure us if the mood is right that we should follow what we are being told.
Instead of the champion of human nobility, and troublemaker for institutions gone wrong, the Spirit in mormonism is more like the second councilor in the bishopric whose duty is merely to carry out orders from the Bishop and to sit in on properly ordered classes only so long as everyone behaves.
So if somebody farts in class and the mood is broken, either the LDS version of the Holy Ghost has fled in terror or the carefully crafted experience has been disrupted, but the mind and will of God should remain unshaken.
As Packer has said, the difference between and emotion and the witness of the spirit is so close as to sometimes be difficult to differentiate. And that is true- if you lose the spirit over a fart, it was only emotion. If true, then it is safe to assume that the church thrives on the blurring between emotion and spirit and between the feeling of belonging and the true confirmation of the spirit. Perhaps it is wise to question not only church doctrines and history, but to carefully evaluate spiritual experiences to be sure your emotions aren't being manipulated in a controlled environment.