Posted by:
fredoi
(
)
Date: January 15, 2014 08:52PM
Why wouldnt it be flattering to JS?
Is there something I don't know?
(LMAO)
Having said that, in all seriousness, the story itself would actually make for an incredible piopic
As long as ALL of it were there
Because when you look back into his formative years, you learn so much more about him and it puts so much of the LDS early history into a chronological context
Thats why I dislike Rough Stone Rolling. The author (IMO) made a deliberate decision to obfuscate the history and surrounding events to core events he does talk about
"This pretty girl lost her shoe at a ball" means much more when you know her name was Cinderalla, and details about her sisters etc
For instance, this paper about his Mother and Father
https://www.sunstonemagazine.com/pdf/064-22-29.pdfThought you'd read it all- maybe not. This seals the deal- shows how the personality and psychological state of the Smiths led to BOM
Its like Chapter 3 of No Man Knows My History, but on acid
If Angels in America were popular, and the BOM musical does well, this would smash it in the ratings (primarily for a US audience).
Even if you aren't LDS, stuff like this and No Man Knows, looking at it from the outside, and then overlaying the escape west, polygamy, garments, blood oaths, mountain meadows, blacks, and so on
It is actually incredible fascinating