Posted by:
cheese
(
)
Date: February 07, 2014 02:36PM
I am thrilled that Tom has done this, and I hope it causes as much damage as possible.....but how can this really stick?
Bizarre religious claims are a dime a dozen, and many are easy to refute. How is this case any different?
I mean, in the Religulous documentary there is a guy who claims he is actually Jesus Christ!! And he's making some sweet cash. Is he liable?
British law must be completely different because my understanding is that this behavior, no matter how fraudulent, is protected in the US.
Am I missing something?