Posted by:
Chump
(
)
Date: April 21, 2014 01:02PM
They start every "argument" by trying to paint the opposition in a negative light: "Critics claim...", etc... They often then ignore the critical assertion. One that's easy to show on FAIR is the back-dating of D&C 20:
http://en.fairmormon.org/Mormonism_and_priesthood/Restoration/Melchizedek/Date"- Was the restoration of the priesthood was "back dated" later by Joseph Smith to justify a desire to dominate the Church?
-Does anyone know "when or how" Joseph Smith received the Melchizedek priesthood?"
They then use vaugue and late references to the priesthood restoration to come up with a narrow window when the priesthood must have been restored. They completely ignore the FACT that the "revelation" that mentions the visits of John, Peter, James, and John was back-dated. There are no notes in the heading of D&C 20 to let members know that the "revelation" was received in peices...the relevant part on the restoration coming years after the fact. Why? Because no sane person would believe that a perfect god could be "the author of so much confusion".