Recovery Board  : RfM
Recovery from Mormonism (RfM) discussion forum. 
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 01:29AM

--Welcome to Joseph Smith’s World of Slam-Dunk Pedophilia

Pedophilia is deemed by psychiatric professionals to be an incurable mental disorder. Some on this board assert that, by definition, Joseph Smith wasn't a pedophile; rather, as one forum contributor put it, he was merely “creepy.” While RfM poster “Reuben nli” admits that Smith’s predatory behavior exhibited toward multiple females was indeed “creepy,” he nonetheless insists that Smith's sexual stalking of young ones “[d]oes [not] meet the definition in the 'DSM' [‘Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders] for pedophilia. . . . It doesn't matter how big of a wall of text SB [Steve Benson] puts up there, it doesn’t change the facts. It wasn't pedophilia.”

(“Re: CES Letter and Pedophilia,” posted by “Reuben nli,” on “Recovery from Mormonism” discussion board, 2 January 2015)


Not so fast, there, “Reuben" (and sorry about that formidable "wall of text"). You might want to do some follow-up reading so that you can perhaps expand your knowledge base when it comes to recognizing and then picking Mormonism's pedophilic prophet poison.
_____


--Defining “Pedophilia” in Ways That Better Explain the Sexual Perversions of Mormonism's "Panties Prophet,” Joseph Smith

According to Kathryn L. Smith, in her article, "Making Pedophiles Take Their Medicine: Chemical Castration Law," "[o]ne broad definition of a pedophile is 'an older person whose conscious sexual desire and responses are directed, at least in part, toward dependent, developmentally immature children and adolescents who do not fully comprehend these actions and are unable to give informed consent.'"

Another type of pedophile is what she describes as the "regressive pedophile," who, as explained in the psychiatric literature, “is not necessarily attracted to children,” but who “turns to children for sex as maladaptive response to an extremely stressful event in the offender's life' . . . . He or she may 'turn to children as docile and controllable substitutes for adult sexual partners,' but does not 'persistently pursue children,' and does not self-identify as a person who is attracted to children.”

(Kathyrn L. Smith, quoted by Nicole Travers, “A Brief Examination of Pedophilia and Sexual Abuse Committed by Nuns Within the Catholic Church,” published in “William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law," Volume 12, Issue 3, Article 10)


In the field of psychiatric disorders, the nature (and, hence, the definition of) pedophilia have been historically fluid, as explained in an article published by the Harvard Medical School entitled, “Pessimism About Pedophilia,” wherein is noted that because “[t]he understanding of pedophilia has evolved over time, . . . each successive edition of the ‘DSM’ has defined this disorder in a slightly different way. The current edition, ‘DSM-IV’, categorizes pedophilia as a disorder only if the sexual fantasies or urges involve pre-pubescent children (defined as 13 or younger), if they last at least six months, if the individual has acted on them or if they cause marked distress (including legal problems). The ‘DSM-IV’ also specifies that a person be at least 16 years old and at least five years older than the pre-pubescent child.”
However, the Harvard Medical School article adds that “[t]he draft version of ‘DSM-V,’ now undergoing review, proposes several changes to the diagnosis of pedophilia. One is to expand the definition of this disorder to include ‘hebephilia,’ an attraction to children who are going through puberty. The hybrid category, ‘pedohebephilia,’ would consist of the pedophilic type (attracted to pre-pubescent children, generally younger than 11), the hebephilic type (attracted to pubescent children, usually ages 11 through 14) and the pedohebephilic type (attracted to both).”

(“Pessimism About Pedophilia,” posted by Harvard Health Publications, under “Pessimism About Pedophilia,” July 2010, at: http://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletters/Harvard_Mental_Health_Letter/2010/July/pessimism-about-pedophilia)


Moreover, according to sexologist Ray Blanchard, MD, there are pedophiles (like Joseph Smith) who are not drawn exclusively to children:

“Some pedophiles may be as attracted to adults as they are to children but it's hard to know how common that is. That's because most pedophilia research is based on people who were arrested for sexual offenses against children, and they may tend to exaggerate their sexual interest in adults to seem more ‘normal] . . . .”

(“What Is Pedophilia?: Answers to Common Questions About Pedophiles and Pedophilia,” by Ray Blanchard, MD, as reviewed by Laura J. Martin, MD, under “Are Pedophiles Only Attracted to Children?,” on “Mental Health Center,” at: http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/features/explaining-pedophilia)


When examining the sexual perversions of Joseph Smith, it is important to keep in mind, as authors Michael Cochran and Meghan Cole explain in their article, “Inside the Mind of a Pedophile,” that one size does not fit all sexual predators:

“Pedophiles can be classified in several ways. For example, pedophilia can be characterized as either exclusive or non-exclusive. Exclusive pedophiles are attracted only to children. They show no interest in sexual partners who are not pre-pubescent children. This desire prolongs even when they are not in the presence of children. Non-exclusive pedophiles are attracted to both adults and children. A large percentage of male pedophiles are homosexual or bisexual in orientation to children, meaning they are attracted to male children or both male and female children. “

(“Inside the Mind of a Pedophile,” by Michael Cochran and Meghan Cole, on “Neuroanthropology” website, at: http://neuroanthropology.net/2010/05/10/inside-the-mind-of-a-pedophile/)
_____


--In the Context of Sexual-Maturation History, Joseph Smith’s Sexual Predation Targeting Young Female Victims Did, in Certain Cases, Constitute Pedophilia

To understand how and why Joseph Smith was guilty of pedophilic molestation of young girls, it is important to first examine the historical rates of U.S. sexual maturation among females in and around Joseph Smith’s era. One analysis indicates that girls in late 19th-century America experienced, on average, their first signs of sexual maturation between the ages of 12 to 14. This fact became evident by examining “the . . . trend [of] how the ages at first menstruation has changed through the centuries,” with it not being attributable to “a modern drop in [of consent, but, rather, [being] due to a 19th-century rise in onset, probably due to nutritional factors.” Another study similarly concludes that “[i]n developed countries, the age of puberty dropped from the 19th to 20th centuries, as nutrition improved and infectious diseases were brought under better control . . . . “

("The Average Age of Menarche in Various Cultures," by the "Museum of Menstruation and Women's Health," at: http://www.mum.org/menarage.htm; and “First Signs of Puberty Seen in Younger Girls,” by Denise Grady, “New York Times,” 9 August 2010, at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/09/health/research/09puberty.html)


RfM posters who understand the damning data--such as “TLC ” (aka, Tom Clark)—lay out an open-and-shut case against Smith the Sicko Seducer. In observations entitled "Joseph Smith, Menses, Pedophilia, Etc.,” Clark empirically explains the reality of what can fairly be described as Smith’s pedophilic addiction:

". . . In our efforts to sort through the wasteland that is Mormon history (fact vs. fiction), it's worthwhile . . . to have some context within which to make our judgments.

". . . The statistics are very clear [on] the notion that the age of sexual maturity among women has changed or is still changing. . . . The age of menarche is dropping in virtually all areas of the world. More on that below.

"[A] claim being disputed is that Joseph Smith was a pedophile. While it's easy to throw that word around in light of today's problems with child abusing priests in the Catholic clergy, the fact remains that pedophilia is defined as '[t]he act or fantasy on the part of an adult of engaging in sexual activity with a child or children.'

"Furthermore, the pathology of pedophilia is understood to be an attraction or activity that is limited to pre-pubescent children. It's been well-established that true pedophiles lose interest almost immediately when a boy or girl exhibits the first signs of sexual maturity.

" . . . [A] quick googling of the word 'pedophilia' will take you to the professional community's definitions. They are very clear as to what does and what doesn't constitute pedophilia.

"By today's definitions, when it comes to the pathology of pedophilia, Joseph Smith would probably not be considered a true pedophile. That doesn't mean however, that he wasn't a lecherous scumbag who would stop at nothing to bed any young woman who captured his fancy.

"More on sexual maturity among women.

"As closely as I can tell from investigating the median age of menarche (first menses) in Joseph Smith's time, it is possible that one or two of the girls he married and/or had relations with might not have been sexually mature. All of the research I've been able to find . . . indicates that the average age of menarche in the mid 1800s was 17.

"What that might tell us about a girl who was 14 or 15 back then is hard to determine because of the nature of averages. In any event, it does make it clear that Joseph Smith was treading a very fine when it came to the sexual maturity of the girls he courted and/or married.

"There is a lot of research in this arena because of the alarming shift in monarchal age from the 1800s to present day where the median onset of menarche has now dropped to age 12.

"' . . . In 1840, the average young woman in Europe and the United States menstruated for the first time at the age of 17; her modern counterpart reaches the age of menstruation at about 12. Well known to biological anthropologists as the "secular trend," this crash in the age of sexual maturity has proceeded at the rate of four months per decade, and, in most populations, continues. . . .'

"'Boys and girls now experience puberty at younger ages than previous generations. In general, girls enter puberty between ages 8 and 13 and reach ‘menarche’ (first menstruation) several years later, while boys enter puberty between ages 9 and 14. The reasons for earlier menarche in girls are not well understood. Most of the change is attributed to better health and nutrition. . . . In North America, age at menarche decreased by three to four months each decade after 1850; in 1988, the median age at menarche was 12.5 years among US girls. . . . In some developing countries, age at menarche appears to be decreasing even faster. For example, in Kenya average age at menarche fell from 14.4 in the late 1970s to 12.9 in the 1980s. . . .'

"So, . . . it helps to understand the context from within which we assess the lecherous scumbag known as Joseph Smith. We don't know if he had sex with prepubescent children, therefore we don't know if he was truly a pedophile. We don't know if the teenaged girls he married and/or had sex with were sexually mature or not.

"But regardless of whether they were sexually mature or not, something in us is sickened by the thoughts of them being coerced into any kind of relationship with this lecher who was pretending to use God as his motivator.

"Joseph Smith was not the first, nor will he be the last, to prey upon young girls for sexual gratification. And that in no way justifies his actions. But in aiming for accuracy in trying to describe Joseph Smith, there are a lot of words other than ‘pedophile’ that do the job more saliently and succinctly. . . .

"What one of us as fathers here today, would hesitate for a second to deck [someone] like [Joseph Smith] if he so much as glanced in any of our daughter's directions? I know that my response would be visceral and swift.

"Makes you wonder what kind of men Smith had around him that they would so willingly hand over their young daughters to him. Therein lies the true pathology of Mormonism."

("Joseph Smith, Menses, Pedophilia, Etc.," by "TLC", aka Tom Clark, on "Recovery from Mormonism" bulletin board, 9 August 2003, at: http://www.exmormon.org/mormon/mormon253.htm)


Another perceptive RfM contributor, "Deconstructor," on his own website asks---then answers--the question: "Was it normal to marry 14-year-old girls in Joseph Smith's time?" To set the stage, he first cites Smith's Mormon scriptural justification for polygamous sex as a general principle required for Mormon exaltation (the same scriptures, by the way, faithfully cited and espoused by fundamentalist Mormon and imprisoned polygamist pedophile, Warren Jeffs):

"And I will bless Joseph Smith and multiply him and give unto him an hundredfold in this world, of fathers and mothers, brothers and sisters, houses and lands, wives and children, and crowns of eternal lives in the eternal worlds."

"And if he have ten virgins given unto him by this law, he cannot commit adultery, for they belong to him, and they are given unto him; therefore is he justified."

"But if one or either of the ten virgins, after she is espoused [to Joseph Smith], shall be with another man, she has committed adultery, and shall be destroyed; for they are given unto Joseph Smith to multiply and replenish the earth, according to my commandment, and to fulfill the promise which was given by my Father before the foundation of the world, and for their exaltation in the eternal worlds, that they may bear the souls of men; for herein is the work of my Father continued, that he may be glorified" (‘Doctrine and Covenants,’ Section 132:55, 62-63).”

Now, the evidence that Joseph Smith--like Warren Jeff’s--had sex with his own picked-for-his-pathological-pervsion underage child victims. “Deconstructor” continues:

"Many LDS Church leaders and historians suggest that sexual relations and the marriage of Joseph Smith and his youngest wife, Helen Mar Kimball, 14 at the time, was 'approaching eligibility.'

"There is no documentation to support the idea that marriage at 14 was 'approaching eligibility.' Actually, marriages even two years later, at the age of 16 , occurred occasionally but infrequently in Helen Mar's culture. Thus, girls marrying at 14 , even 15, were very much out of the ordinary. 16 was comparatively rare, but not unheard of. American women began to marry in their late teens; around different parts of the United States the average age of marriage varied from 19 to 23.

"In the United States the average age of menarche (first menstruation) dropped from 16.5 in 1840 to 12.9 in 1950. More recent figures indicate that it now occurs on average at 12.8 years of age. The mean age of first marriages in colonial America was between 19.8 years to 23.7, most women were married during the age period of peak ‘fecundity’ (fertility).

"Mean pubertal age has declined by some 3.7 years from the 1840’s.

"The psychological sexual maturity of Helen Mar Kimball in today’s average age of menarche (first menstruation) would put her psychological age of sexual maturity at the time of the marriage of Joseph Smith at 9.1 years old. (16.5 years-12.8 years = 3.7 years) (12.8 years-3.7 years=9.1 years)

"The fact is Helen Mar Kimball's sexual development was still far from complete. Her psychological sexual maturity was not competent for procreation. The coming of puberty is regarded as the termination of childhood; in fact the term ‘child’ is usually defined as the human being from the time of birth to the on-coming of puberty. Puberty the point of time at which the sexual development is completed. In young women, from the date of the first menstruation to the time at which she has become fitted for marriage, the average lapse of time is assumed by researchers to be two years.

"Age of eligibility for women in Joseph Smith’s time-frame would start at a minimum of 19-and-a-half years old.

"This would suggest that Joseph Smith had sexual relations and married several women before the age of eligibility, and some very close to the age of eligibility including:

"Fanny Alger, 16

"Sarah Ann Whitney, 17

"Lucy Walker, 17

"Flora Ann Woodworth, 16

"Emily Dow Partridge, 19

"Sarah Lawrence, 17

"Maria Lawrence, 19

"Helen Mar Kimball, 14

"Melissa Lott, 19

"Nancy M. Winchester, [14?]

"And then we have these testimonies:

"'Joseph was very free in his talk about his women. He told me one day of a certain girl and remarked, that she had given him more pleasure than any girl he had ever enjoyed. I told him it was horrible to talk like this.' (Joseph Smith's close confidant and LDS Church First Counselor, William Law, interview in 'Salt Lake Tribune,' July 31, 1887)

"When Heber C. Kimball asked Sister Eliza R. Snow the question if she was not a virgin although married to Joseph Smith, she replied, 'I thought you knew Joseph Smith better than that.' (Stake President Angus M. Cannon, statement of interview with Joseph III, 23, LDS archives)"

"Short Bios of Smith's wives:
http://www.wivesofjosephsmith.org


"Did Smith have sex with his wives?:
http://www.i4m.com/think/history/joseph_smith_sex.htm


"Whatever the average age of menarche might have been in the mid 19th-century, the average age of marriage was around 20 for women and 22 for men. And a gap of 15 to 20 years or more between partners was very unusual, not typical. Whatever biology might have to say, according to the morals of his time, several of Joseph Smith's wives were still inappropriately young for him.

"It is a pure myth that 19th-century American girls married at age 12-14.

"For example, Laura Ingalls Wilder, from 'Little House on the Prairie' fame, was born in 1867, which puts her later than Joseph Smith but still in the 1800s. She tells of hearing of the marriage of a 13-year-old girl, and being shocked. She also notes that the girl's mother 'takes in laundry,' and is sloppy and unkempt--implying that "nice" people don't marry off their teenaged daughters. Laura, herself, became engaged at 17--but her parents asked her to wait until she was 18 to marry.

"You merely need to go to your local courthouse and ask to see the old 19th century marriage books. Take a look at and pay attention to the age at marriage. Sure a very few did, but it was far from the norm. The vast majority of women married after the age of twenty.

"In fact, look up the marriage ages in the Smith family before polygamy. You'll find that one of the Smith girls was 19. The rest of them, and their sisters-in-law, were in their early 20s when they married. The Smith boys' first wives were in their 20s. The same pattern was true for the various branches of my family and the rest of American society at the time.

"On the extremely rare occasions women younger than 17 married, it was to men close to their same age, not 15 to 20 years older.

"The case is even true in pioneer Utah among first marriages. Mormon men in their 20s started out marrying someone their own age. Then, later, these older men married girls under 20 to be their plural wives. But the first wives were the age of the husband and married over the age of 20. This is still the case is the rural Utah polygamist communities.

"References:

"Coale and Zelnik assume a mean age of marriage for white women of 20 (1963: 37). Sanderson's assumptions are consistent with a mean of 19.8 years (Sanderson 1979: 343). The Massachusetts family reconstitutions revealed somewhat higher mean ages. For Hingham, Smith reports an age at first marriage of 23.7 at the end of the eighteenth century (1972: Table 3, p. 177). For Sturbridge, the age for a comparable group was 22.46 years (Osterud and Fulton 1976: Table 2, p. 484), and in Franklin County it was 23.3 years (Temkin-Greener, H., and A.C. Swedlund. 1978. Fertility Transition in the Connecticut Valley:1740-1850. Population Studies 32 (March 1978):27-41.: Table 6, p. 34).

"Jack Larkin, 'The Reshaping of Everyday Life,' 1790-1840 (New York: Harper & Row, 1988), 63; Laurel Thatcher Ulrich, 'Good Wives: Image and Reality in the Lives of Women in Northern New England, 1650-1750' [NY: Oxford University Press, 1980], 6; Nancy F. Cott, 'Young Women in the Second Great Awakening in New England,' 'Feminist Studies' 3 [1975]: 16; Dr. Dorothy V. Whipple, 'Dynamics of Development: Euthenic Pediatrics' [New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966]"

("Was It Normal to Marry 14-Year-Old Girls in Joseph Smith's Time?," by "Deconstructor," at: http://www.i4m.com/think/polygamy/teen_polygamy.htm


Deconstructor concurs with the above assessment, declaring its findings to be "absolutely correct."

("TLC Is Absolutely Correct; Here's a Repost on This Subject," by "Deconstructor," on "Recovery from Mormonism" bulletin board, 9 August 2003, at: http://www.exmormon.org/mormon/mormon253.htm)
_____


--The Sick Sexual Predations of the “Prophet” Joseph Smith

It bears keeping in mind that the First Assistant of the Mormon Church, Oliver Cowdery, never retracted his accusation against Smith of having had both a predatory and an adulterous affair with teenager Fanny Alger. How could he, given Joseph Smith's raunchy record? Let's review it:

Smith's first known sexual affair was, in fact, with Fanny, who was living with Smith and his first wife Emma in their Kirtland, Ohio, home. Fanny was also Smith's first confirmed plural wife. Smith “came to know [her] in Kirtland during early 1833 when she, at the age of 16, stayed at his home as a housemaid.”

Like fundamentalist Mormon polygamist Warren Jeffs, Joseph Smith engaged in sex with underage girls.

*Smith's Well-Earned Reputation for Being a Sex-Obsessed, Self-Possessed Philanderer

As a baseline (and as known in Mormon circles of his day), Smith was legendary for his sexual attraction to women.

In fact, the official LDS publication, “History of the Church” (vol. 5, p. 53), acknowledged the lore of Smith's attraction to females, as described in 'The Wasp,” a LDS newspaper published in Nauvoo, Illinois:

“[On 2 July 1843], the [Mormon] Church newspaper 'The Wasp' publishe[d] a phrenology chart of Smith's head and personality. The first trait [was] 'Amativeness-11, L[arge]. Extreme susceptibility; passionately fond of the company of the other sex.' The official 'History of the Church' still publishes this chart, along with the caution that such a high score indicates 'extreme liability to perversion' in the trait.”

Perversion is right, whether with under-age girls or female adults.

Smith's moves to seduce other men's wives were so brazen and notorious that they led one distraught husband--Orson Pratt--to attempt suicide in Nauvoo on 15 July 1842:

“Thousands of Nauvoo Mormons search[ed] for Orson Pratt after discovering a suicide note. They find him distraught because Smith, according to Pratt's wife, had tried to seduce Pratt's wife Sarah.”

No only did Smith have a reputation as a ladies' man, he also had a record of defending friends of his who were sleeping around.

According to the “Minutes of the High Council of the Church of Jesus Christ of Nauvoo Illinois” (6 February 1841), Smith directed “the Nauvoo high council not to excommunicate Theodore Turley for 'sleeping with two females,' requiring him only to confess 'that he had acted unwisely, unjustly, imprudently, and unbecoming.'”

Eventually, Smith's sexual excess caught up with him in court. on 23 March 1844, William Law filed suit against Smith for committing adultery with Smith's foster daughter and plural wife:

“William Law file[d] a formal complaint with the Hancock County [Illinois] circuit court charging Smith was living 'in an open state of adultery' with Maria Lawrence, Smith's foster daughter and polygamous wife. Maria Lawrence, was a teenaged orphan who was living in the Smith household. In fact, Smith had secretly married both Maria, age 19 and her sister Sarah, age 17 on 11 May 1843 and was serving as executor of their $8,000 estate.

"William Law apparently hoped that disclosing Smith's relationship with the young girls might lead him to abandon polygamy, but Smith immediately excommunicated Law, had himself appointed the girls' legal guardian and rejected the charge in front of a church congregation on 26 May 1844, denying that he had more than one wife.”(Joseph Smith, “History of the Church,” vol. 6, p. 403; and Richard S. Van Wagoner, “Mormon Polygamy: A History,” p. 66)

(see “Joseph Smith's Polygamy Chronology,” at: http://www.i4m.com/think/polygamy/JS_Polygamy_Timeline.htm)


*Joseph Smith and 16-year-old Fanny Alger

Smith's first known sexual affair was with a teenager named Fannie Alger, who was living with Smith and his first wife Emma in their Kirtland, Ohio, home. Fanny was also Smith's first confirmed plural wife. Smith “came to know [her] in Kirtland during early 1833 when she, at the age of 16, stayed at his home as a housemaid. Described as 'a very nice and comely young woman,' according to Benjamin Johnson, Fanny lived with the Smith family from 1833 to 1836.”

Fannie eventually became the target of Smith's sexual advances, with Smith's predatory behavior soon becoming the talk of the town:

“Martin Harris, one of the 'Three Witnesses' to the Book of Mormon, recalled that the prophet's 'servant girl' claimed he had made 'improper proposals to her, which created quite a talk amongst the people.' Mormon Fanny Brewer similarly reported 'much excitement against the Prophet . . . [involving] an unlawful intercourse between himself and a young orphan girl residing in his family and under his protection."

Emma discovered the sexual affair between Smith and Fanny and exploded in anger. Caught with his hand in Fanny's cookie jar, Smith confessed. A noticeably pregnant Fanny eventually was kicked out of the house by Emma, as reported thusly:

“Former Mormon apostle William McLellin later wrote that Emma Smith substantiated the Smith-Alger affair. According to McLellin, Emma was searching for her husband and Alger one evening when through a crack in the barn door she saw 'him and Fanny in the barn together alone' on the hay mow. McLellin, in a letter to one of Smith's sons, added that the ensuing confrontation between Emma and her husband grew so heated that Rigdon, Frederick G. Williams, and Oliver Cowdery had to mediate the situation.

"After Emma related what she had witnessed, Smith, according to McLellin, 'confessed humbly, and begged forgiveness. Emma and all forgave him.' While Oliver Cowdery may have forgiven his cousin Joseph Smith, he did not forget the incident. Three years later, when provoked by the prophet, Cowdery countered by calling the Fanny Alger episode 'a dirty, nasty, filthy affair.'

“Chauncey Webb recounts Emma’s later discovery of the relationship: 'Emma was furious, and drove the girl, who was unable to conceal the consequences of her celestial relation with the prophet, out of her house' . . .

“' . . . Webb, Smith's grammar teacher . . . reported that when the pregnancy became evident, Emma Smith drove Fanny from her home. . . . . Webb's daughter, Ann Eliza Webb Young, a divorced wife of Brigham Young, remembered that Fanny was taken into the Webb home on a temporary basis . . . . . Fanny stayed with relatives in nearby Mayfield until about the time Joseph fled Kirtland for Missouri.

“Fanny left Kirtland in September 1836 with her family. Though she married non-Mormon Solomon Custer on 16 November 1836 and was living in Dublin City, Indiana, far from Kirtland, her name still raised eyebrows. Fanny Brewer, a Mormon visitor to Kirtland in 1837, observed 'much excitement against the Prophet … [involving] an unlawful intercourse between himself and a young orphan girl residing in his family and under his protection.'”

(Richard Van Wagoner, “Sidney Rigdon: A Portrait in Religious Excess,” p. 291; and Van Wagoner, “Mormon Polygamy: A History,” p. 8; cited in ibid)


*Joseph Smith and 19-year-old Zina D. Huntington

Smith further cemented his reputation for fooling around by making moves on a then-married teenager, Zina D. Huntington, who he asked on 25 October 1841 to become another of his multiple wives. Smith informed her (using a line he also employed with Emma and others) that he was ordered to do so by a sword-wielding angel who was threatening to kill him if he disobeyed:

“Already married, 19 year-old Zina remained conflicted with Smith's polygamy proposal 'until a day in October, apparently, when Joseph sent [her older brother] Dimick to her with a message: an angel with a drawn sword had stood over Smith and told him that if he did not establish polygamy, he would lose “his position and his life.” Zina, faced with the responsibility for his position as prophet, and even perhaps his life, finally acquiesced.' They were secretly married within days “

(Todd Compton, “In Sacred Loneliness: The Plural Wives of Joseph Smith,” pp. 80-81, cited in ibid).


*Joseph Smith and 19-year-old Nancy Rigdon

Smith also secretly hit on another teenager, 19-year-old Nancy Rigdon, daughter of his close confidant Sidney Rigdon, in Nauvoo on 10 April 1842.

Nancy was not amused:

“ . . . Smith invited Nancy Rigdon, nineteen-year-old daughter of his close friend and counselor, Sidney Rigdon, to meet him at the home of Orson Hyde. Upon her arrival Smith greeted her, ushered her into a private room, then locked the door. After swearing her to secrecy, wrote George W. Robinson, Smith announced his 'affection for her for several years, and wished that she should be his . . . the Lord was well pleased with this matter . . .here was no sin in it whatever . . .but, if she had any scruples of conscience about the matter, he would marry her privately.'

“Incredulous, Nancy countered that 'if she ever got married she would marry a single man or none at all.' Grabbing her bonnet, she ordered the door opened or she would 'raise the neighbors.' She then stormed out of the Hyde-Richards residence.

“The next day, Smith wrote Nancy a letter, where he justified his advances, saying 'That which is wrong under one circumstance, may be, and often is, right under another . . . . Whatever God requires is right, no matter what it is, although we may not see the reason thereof till long after the events transpire. . . . even things which might be considered abominable to all who understand the order of heaven only in part, but which in reality were right because God gave and sanctioned by special revelation.' This is his first written statement of theocratic ethics.”

(“Official History of the Church,” vol. 5, p. 134-36; and Van Wagoner, “Sidney Rigdon: A Portrait in Religious Excess,” p. 295; cited in ibid)


*Joseph Smith and 17-year-old Sarah Ann Whitney

Prior to wedding Sarah in Nauvoo on 27 July 1842, Smith conveniently received a “revelation” for the benefit of Sarah and her parents, essentially condoning his adultery in the name of polygamy:

“ . . .Smith received and recorded [this] revelation on polygamy, which remains in LDS Church archives. Although recorded in the official 'Revelation Book' of the time, the revelation was not canonized as scripture. In this revelation, the Lord reveals a plural marriage ceremony, which would later be altered and become the sealing ceremony in the temple . . . :

“'Verily, Thus Saith the Lord, unto my servant Newell. K. Whitney, a revelation to Newell K. Whitney, 27 July 1842, and Joseph Smith., Elizabeth Ann Whitney and Sarah Ann Whitney

"Verily, thus saith the Lord unto my servant N[ewel]. K. Whitney, the thing that my servant Joseph Smith has made known unto you and your family [his plural marriage to Sarah Ann Whitney], and which you have agreed upon is right in mine eyes and shall be rewarded upon your heads with honor and immortality and eternal life to all your house both old and young because of the lineage of my priesthood, saith the Lord. It shall be upon you and upon your children after you from generation to generation, by virtue of the holy promise which I now make unto you, saith the Lord.

"'These are the words which you shall pronounce upon my servant Joseph and your daughter Sarah Ann. Whitney. They shall take each other by the hand and you shall say, “You both mutually agree," calling them by name, “to be each other's companion so long as you both shall live preserving yourselves for each other and from all others and also throughout all eternity, reserving only those rights which have been given to my servant Joseph by revelation and commandment and by legal Authority in times passed.”

“'If you both agree to covenant and do this, then I give you Sarah Ann Whitney, my daughter, to Joseph Smith to be his wife, to observe all the rights between you both that belong to that condition. I do it in my own name and in the name of my wife, your mother, and in the name of my holy progenitors, by the right of birth which is of priesthood, vested in my by revelation and commandment and promise of the living. God, obtained by the Holy Melchizedik Jethro and others of the Holy Fathers, commanding in the name of the Lord all those powers to concentrate in you and through to your posterity forever.

“'All these things I do in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ that through this order he may be glorified and that through the power of anointing David may reign King over Israel, which shall hereafter be revealed. Let immortality and eternal life henceforth be sealed upon your heads forever and ever. Amen."

(original manuscript of “Kirtland Revelation Book,” Church Historical Department, Ms f 490 # 2; “The Historical Record,” vol. 6, p. 222 (1887 edition); and Compton, “In Sacred Loneliness,” p. 348-49; all cited in ibid)


Smith then made secret arrangements to have a sexual rendezvous with Sarah, without Emma finding out. On 19 August 1842, he wrote the following love letter to Sarah, laying out his plans to meet up with her:

“To arrange [a] night liaison with [his] plural wife--Newel K. Whitney's daughter Sarah Ann--Smith writes: ' . . . [T]he only thing to be careful of is to find out when Emma comes, then you cannot be safe but when she is not here, there is the most perfect safety. . . .

“'Only be careful to escape observation, as much as possible, I know it is a heroic undertaking; but so much the greater friendship and the more joy; when I see you I will tell you all my plans. I cannot write them on paper. Burn this letter as soon as you read it; keep [it] all locked up in your breasts, my life depends upon it. . . . .

“I close my letter, I think Emma won't come tonight. If she don't, don't fail to come tonight. I subscribe myself your most obedient, and affectionate, companion, and friend. Joseph Smith."

(“Joseph Smith, Jr., to Newel K. Whitney, Elizabeth Ann Whitney, etc.,” 18 August 1842, George Albert Smith Family Papers, Special Collections, Marriott Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, text and signature of this document in the handwriting of Joseph Smith, Jr.; this document has been reproduced in Dean C. Jessee's masterful “The Personal Writings of Joseph Smith” [Salt Lake City, Utah: Deseret Book Co., 1984], pp. 539-40; and Compton, “In Sacred Loneliness,” p. 349-350; cited in ibid)


*Joseph Smith and 19-year-old Emily Dow Partridge

Smith secretly took Emily as another of his wives in Nauvoo on 4 March 1843, with Elder Heber C. Kimball officiating the ceremony.

Emily later reported in sworn testimony that she then had honeymoon sex with Smith the next night:

“Emily D. Partridge Smith testified that she 'roomed' with Joseph the night following her marriage to him and said that she had 'carnal intercourse' with him.

(“Temple Lot” case, complete transcript, pp. 364, 367, 384; Foster, “Religion and Sexuality,” p. 15; Andrew Jenson, ”LDS Biographical Encyclopedia.” [1951] vol. 1, p. 697; S. Easton, “Marriages in Nauvoo Region 1839-45;” “Civil Marriages in Nauvoo 1839-45.” Lyndon Cook, “Nauvoo Temple Endowment Register 1845-46; Mormon Manuscripts to 1846;” cited in ibid).


*Joseph Smith and 16-year-old Flora Ann Woodworth

Smith married Flora in April 1843 (exact date unknown).

(Elder William Clayton affidavit, in “Historical Record,” vol. 6:, p. 225; cited in ibid)


*Joseph Smith and 17-year-old Lucy Walker

Smith married Lucy on 1 May 1843, in the Smith's store, Nauvoo, Illinois, officiated by William Clayton

(FamilySearch.com record for Joseph Smith, Jr.; cited in ibid)


*Joseph Smith and 19-year-old Maria Lawrence

Smith married Maria on 11 May 1843.

(“Historical Record,” vol. 6, p. 223; Lucy Walker Smith Kimball, in “Temple Lot” case, full transcript, p. 461, LDS archives; Helen Kimball Whitney, “Woman's Exponent,” 15 February 1886, p. 138; cited in ibid)


*Joseph Smith and 17-year-old Sarah Lawrence

Smith married Sarah the same day he married Sarah Lawrence's sister Maria, 11 May 1843.

(FamilySearch.com record for Joseph Smith Jr., “Historical Record,” col. 6, p. 223; Lucy Walker Smith Kimball, in “Temple Lot“ case, full transcript, p. 461, LDS archives; Helen Kimball Whitney, “Woman's Exponent," 15 February 1886, p. 138, cited in ibid)


*Joseph Smith and 16-year-old Nancy Maria Winchester

Smith married Nancy in Nauvoo on 28 July 1843:

“According to Mormon Church Historian Andrew Jenson, Nancy married Joseph sometime before his death in June of 1844. In addition, Orson Whitney, son of Nancy Maria's friend, Helen, also identified her as Smith's wife. These two witnesses, taken together, make a good case for Nancy as a plural spouse of Joseph. Though there is no exact date for her marriage to the prophet, the best hypothesis is that the ceremony took place in 1843.”

(Andrew Jenson, “LDS Biographical Encyclopedia” [1951], vol. 1, p. 697; “ Marriages in Nauvoo Region 1839-45;" and Compton, “In Sacred Loneliness,” p. 606; cited in ibid)


*Joseph Smith and 19-year-old Melissa Lott

Smith married Melissa in Nauvoo on 20 September 1843, with Hyrum Smith officiating:

“Melissa testified that her marriage to Smith included sex.”

(FamilySearch.com record for Joseph Smith Jr.; and Affidavit of Melissa Willes, 3 August 1893; cited in ibid)


*Joseph Smith and 14-year-old Helen Mar Kimball

As part of Smith's brimming quiver of teenager brides, in May 1843 in Smith's Nauvoo store, he married an underage 14-year-old female named Helen Mar Kimball. Helen's father, Heber C. Kimball, officiated the wedding of his underage daughter to Smith.

Helen was the youngest of Smith's brides--and according to Helen, he had sex with her.

Helen wrote about how her marriage to Smith was orchestrated by her father, Heber C. Kimball:

"Having a great desire to be connected with the Prophet, Joseph, he (my father) offered me to him; this I afterwards learned from the Prophet's own mouth. My father had but one Ewe Lamb, but willingly laid her upon the altar: how cruel this seemed to my mother whose heartstrings were already stretched until they were ready to snap asunder, for she had already taken Sarah Noon to wife and she thought she had made sufficient sacrifice but the Lord required more."

Smith pressured Helen to marry him, giving her only 24 hours to give him answer.

Helen wrote:

"[My father] left me to reflect upon it for the next twenty four hours. . . . I was skeptical--one minute [I] believed, then doubted. I thought of the love and tenderness that he felt for his only daughter, and I knew that he would not cast me off, and this was the only convincing proof That I had of its being right.”

The next day, Smith came by to explain to Helen the “Law of Celestial Marriage,” and, having done that, to take her as his latest bride.

Helen described Smith's pitch:

“After which he said to me, 'If you take this step, it will ensure your eternal salvation and exaltation and that of your father's household and all of your kindred.' This promise was so great that I willingly gave myself to purchase so glorious a reward."

Helen's mother was none too pleased with the marriage, as Helen explains:

"None but God and his angels could see my mother's bleeding heart. When Joseph asked her if she was willing, she replied 'If Helen is willing I have nothing more to say.' She had witnessed the sufferings of others, who were older and who better understood the step they were taking, and to see her child, who had yet seen her fifteenth summer, following the same thorny path, in her mind she saw the misery which was as sure to come as the sun was to rise and set; but it was hidden from me."

Helen was under the misimpression that her marriage to Smith was merely “dynastic.” She was to find out soon enough, however, that it was sexual. Helen later confessed to a close friend in Nauvoo:

"I would never have been sealed to Joseph had I known it was anything more than ceremony. I was young, and they deceived me, by saying the salvation of our whole family depended on it.”

(Helen Mar Whitney journal: Helen Mar autobiography: “Woman's Exponent,” 1880; reprinted in “A Woman's View;” FamilySearch.com record for Joseph Smith Jr.; and Richard Van Wagoner, “Mormon Polygamy: A History,” p. 53; cited in ibid)

**********


Conclusion: Mothers, Grab Your Children

The word's out: Even the cornered Mormon Church has finally been forced by the facts to openly admit that Joseph Smith married young girls. Truth be told, Smith was a sexual pervert when it came to young girls and older women alike, displaying a wide range of psychologically disturbed predatory behavior toward females wherever and whenever he could corner them.

Let’s especially not forget his pre-pubescent victims.


**P.S.: Below are previously unseen photos of Joseph Smith with Helen Mar Kimball:

http://www.childbrides.org/images/Warren_kissing_Merrianne.jpg


(Excuse me, that's Warren Jeffs. Please pardon the confusion: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-fGLlXqw69hg/UDO_XVXLF2I/AAAAAAAAAF0/mAe0JS45jWg/s1600/JosephWarren.png)



Edited 18 time(s). Last edit at 01/06/2015 05:02PM by steve benson.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: SL Cabbie ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 03:00AM

I recently picked up a copy of Vol. 2 of Bagley's "Kingdom in the West" series. Written by Bagley's mentor, an award-winning historian himself, David Bigler, the work is titled, "The Mormon Theocracy in the American West: 1847-1896":

http://www.amazon.com/The-Forgotten-Kingdom-Theocracy-1847-1896/dp/087062282X

>But faced with growing outside pressure, a lower than expected flow of emigrants (due at least in part to the 1852 polygamy announcement), and a lack of funds, Mormon leaders in 1855 moved more aggressively to promote a population buildup.

>On October 19 settlers at Manti heard instructions given earlier that month at their faith's general conference in Great Salt Lake City. One had to do with polygamy, telling the young men to get married at sixteen, and take two wives and a dozen if they wished," while girls were told "they were old enough to get married at fourteen," said Azariah Smith. (his journal is footnoted)

>Lorenzo Brown liked the "humorous" touch that Apostle Heber C. Kimball put on the teaching at the fall meeting. Brigham Young's first counselor "wanted all the girls 14 & boys 16 to go to it and get married or rather get married and go to it," the 33-year-old New Yorker said. Brown also noted that Brigham Young said "there were spirits of a nobler class waiting to take bodies & that it was the duty of every man to be taking to himself more wives." (also footnoted; Brown's journal here)

The "doctrinal interplay" between sexuality/polygamy and political power is illuminating to me. Nineteenth century Mormon fanaticism sought to augment its political power--Will and Dave's theme repeatedly picks up this agenda particularly well--by playing on the biblical "multiply and replenish the earth" admonition--and we know that Brigham Young sought to pad census figures during that era in a move to get Congress to approve statehood.

And yes, power is a factor in the dynamics of sexual predation.

Scary stuff...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/06/2015 03:04AM by SL Cabbie.

Options: ReplyQuote
Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 04:20PM

It's called blood atonement, history style. :)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/06/2015 04:24PM by steve benson.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: GNPE ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 03:05AM

funny/Ironic how mormons will butcher the language to defend against verifiable facts (spin, re-define, obfuscate), but when they use a word - term for their own purposes ... it's as if they Own It!

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: rt ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 03:39AM

Nevertheless, I think it's difficult to apply general conclusions from statistical data to specific cases.

That is why I purposefully avoided this approach in my own research on Joseph Smith's polygamy. Even without statistical analysis (which I am unqualified for anyway), the historical data clearly shows that Joseph Smith's behaviour was deviant. It did not even come close to adhering to any social norm of his time.

That is all we need to establish when confronted with the apologist argument that what Joe did was normal back then.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/06/2015 03:40AM by rt.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 03:45AM

. . . with young, even pre-pubescent females being some (but, of course, not all) of Joseph Smith's victims. NONE of that was remotely close to being normal, as a history of the evolution of human sexual maturation makes abundantly clear. Other than that, it was all quite godly, as Mormons would solemnly say, pray and obey.

In the words of the Prophet of the Last Dispensation of the Fullness of Times:

"Praise the Lord and pass me the kiddies."



Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 01/06/2015 04:00AM by steve benson.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: baneberry ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 03:49AM

Orson Pratt, Brigham Young, and others had several young wives too.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 03:51AM


Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: baneberry ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 03:59AM

Once the "Saints" were into Deseret and openly practicing polygamy, it was every man for himself. Get 'em while they're hot!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/06/2015 04:06AM by baneberry.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: USN77 ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 11:45AM

The problem with posting a "wall of text" is that it can obscure your message. I personally enjoy reading the facts you (Steve) post, Steve, but honestly, I don't always have time to make it through your entire post.

I know there were others who specifically challenged you (or you challenged them) on the question of whether Jeremy should have used the term "pedophile" in his CES letter, and I was not one of them. But I did say I personally wouldn't have used the term because it is a term of art in the legal and psychological professions, and may not mean the same thing to everyone who reads it. While I agree with you that Jeremy did have a basis to use the term "pedophile" in reference to Joseph Smith, your post above does not appear to materially advance your position. Rather than removing "Ifs, Ands or Butts" (I presume you purposely misspelled "Buts" for the comic effect), the authorities you cite show that the term remains ambiguous even in the psychological community. In other words, we are back where we started: you are correct that Joseph Smith was a pedophile, and those who insist he wasn't a pedophile are also correct.

Since I haven't made public my version of a "CES Letter" (due to employment concerns), I don't have any right to criticize Jeremy's choice in terminology. If I were writing the CES Letter, I think I would be balancing the effect of pointing out just how criminally deviant Joseph Smith was against turning off potentially open-minded readers of my letter. Since Jeremy's letter was originally written to a TBM institute teacher, I assume he felt the man's mind would already be closed, and therefore the emotionally-charged term "pedophile" was more likely to be thought-provoking than thought-stopping. I support that decision, but I still think people who prefer to avoid terms that susceptible of varying interpretations, are also justified in labeling Joseph Smith a sexual deviant rather than going all the way to pedophile.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 03:44PM

In this case, we're talking about the damning, sourced and linked details needed for a sound understanding of Joseph Smith's historically-verifiable and currently-authentictable perverse pattern of pedophilia--a history where the term "pedophilia" can persuasively be shown to accurately describe at least some of Smith's deviant sexual behavior. If employing the term "pedophilia" is too emotionally charged for some to handle, then it's incumbent on the writer to define the term for the reader in ways which make clear that its usage is both justifiable and necessary. Trouble is, that requires details. Damn those details, you say? If you do, there's no way to proceed with informed full speed ahead. If you simply don't have the time to do the necessary reading, then you can always proceed half-speed ahead. :)



Edited 13 time(s). Last edit at 01/06/2015 04:00PM by steve benson.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: ificouldhietokolob ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 12:15PM

As an aside...I'd bet real money that Joseph never asked or knew if Helen had reached "menarche" or not. I strongly suspect he didn't care, and it wouldn't have mattered one way or another.
Which, if true, supports the label "pedophile." He wanted this young girl, and didn't care if she was sexually mature or not.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 04:01PM

All they care about is power.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: ConcernedCitizen ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 04:32PM

,,,there has been no documented history regarding "Butts" or use of "Butts" in any Church-authenticated or validated history accounts. Perhaps that has been lost or suppressed in the secret vault inventories, BUTT as for now...........no acknowledged or documented activites in the rear quarter..........go figure.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 04:37PM

As noted apologist for all things Mormon, Terry Givens, boldly declares in his book, "People of Paradox: A History of Mormon Culture":

"Few critics can fault the sophistication of what Mormon scholars are doing to BUTTRESS claims to Book of Mormon historicity."

(Terry L. Givens, "People of Paradox: A History of Mormon Culture," Chapter 11, "Fomenting the Pot," p.233, emphasis added, at: https://books.google.com/books?id=MA5ypzq2tf0C&pg=PA233&lpg=PA233&dq=MOrmon+buttress&source=bl&ots=UnkTOnZ_3g&sig=ptp_15qCtH_hPjjCgL0IiBON_AQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=zlWsVKrRNde3yATMlYHABQ&ved=0CEwQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=MOrmon%20buttress&f=false)

Then, of course, Mormon excuse-maker extraordinaire, Richard L. Bushman, in his "Rough Stone Rolling":

"One would expect Joseph Smith to BUTTRESS his authority by highlighting his call from God . . .."

(Richard L. Bushman, "Rough Stone Rolling," under "Priesthood and Church Government," pp. 265-66, emphasis added, at:ttps://books.google.com/books?id=Mz3tpz4eRBQC&pg=PA265&lpg=PA265&dq=JOseph+SMith+buttress&source=bl&ots=gb5VYuoW-f&sig=jRQpIh7wvKvH-OnHDyNPJwR3jUk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=o1usVLu3EYmpyATOkIHICA&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=JOseph SMith buttress&f=false


Robert M. Price, another go-to Mormon man, writes in his article "Joseph Smith, Inspired Author of the Book of Mormon":

"By chopping all the intervening material in the Gospels between the initial calling of the Twelve and their endowment with the Spirit in Acts 2, Joseph Smith has correctly recognized that both stories are functionally equivalent, both of them trying to BUTTRESS the ecclesiastical authority of the college of apostles."

(Robert W. Price, "Joseph Smith, Inspired Author of the Book of Mormon," emphasis added, at; http://www.robertmprice.mindvendor.com/art_josmith.htm)



Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 01/06/2015 06:44PM by steve benson.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: ConcernedCitizen ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 04:41PM

...my Depends feels dirty...............

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: matt ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 06:33PM

He probably took them before any other man could take them.

Perverted and greedy.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: saucie ( )
Date: January 06, 2015 08:03PM

I have often thought that sexual power over women and young

girls was one of the main reasons Smith started the whole

church. He could make money doing it, and satisfy his

his predatory sexual sick needs and all the while look as if

he were a righteous person called of god. What a truly horrid

person he was.

Options: ReplyQuote
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In


Screen Name: 
Your Email (optional): 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **    **        **  **    **  **     ** 
 **         **  **         **  **   **    **   **  
 **          ****          **  **  **      ** **   
 ******       **           **  *****        ***    
 **           **     **    **  **  **      ** **   
 **           **     **    **  **   **    **   **  
 ********     **      ******   **    **  **     **