Recovery Board  : RfM
Recovery from Mormonism (RfM) discussion forum. 
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Posted by: donbagley ( )
Date: January 29, 2015 08:54PM

As they shout on Family Feud, "Good answer!"

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: baura ( )
Date: January 29, 2015 11:07PM

For completeness here's Oaks' statement as quoted in the SL Trib:

"I know that the history of the church is not to seek apologies
or to give them," Oaks said in an interview. "We sometimes look
back on issues and say, 'Maybe that was counterproductive for
what we wish to achieve,' but we look forward and not backward."

http://www.sltrib.com/lifestyle/faith/2108746-155/we-all-can-be-more-civil

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: baura ( )
Date: January 29, 2015 11:15PM

Next Oaks quote, in the same SL Trib article is:

The church doesn't "seek apologies," he said, "and we don't
give them."

Note the pattern. The Church doesn't give apologies.

Giving an apology would be something caring and useful to
someone ELSE than the Church. It would be taking someone
else's feelings into account.

Then there's the whole "We sometimes look back on issues and
say, 'Maybe that was counterproductive for what we wish to
achieve,'"

Notice that it's only about how productive their behavior was
for what THEY wanted to achieve. How their behavior (teaching
the fundamental spiritual inferiority of Blacks for over a
century) may have been harmful to others doesn't matter.

This is the classic definition of sociopathy. The Church is
sociopathic.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: cludgie ( )
Date: January 30, 2015 07:17AM

I think they know that apologies open them up to litigation. Who fears litigation more than the 12+3?

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: MCR ( )
Date: January 30, 2015 09:23AM

It's not litigation they fear, it's pure arrogance, sociopathy. When I went to a Presbyterian service, the minister was so contrite and apologetic about the Church's indifferent stand on civil rights during the 60's when their support would've mattered. The clear inference--because SSM and women's rights are the current topics at hand--was "We could be wrong again," and he was apologizing in advance if the church was wrong and asking God's forgiveness for the trespasses he, or the church, might commit in future.

TSSC is a fraud that teaches people narcissim. They can't apologize because they can't be wrong. As another poster said, Oaks thinks he was born to teach fundamental principles to other people. He wasn't born to learn anything from the great unwashed.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: justarelative ( )
Date: January 29, 2015 11:45PM

...and besides, "some truths are not very helpful."



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/29/2015 11:46PM by justarelative.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: almostthere ( )
Date: January 30, 2015 09:12AM

Hahaha, awesome. Also, the Bish looks like Rudy Giulliani.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: MCR ( )
Date: January 30, 2015 09:27AM

"We sometimes look back on issues and
say, 'Maybe that was counterproductive for what we wish to
achieve"

When your God's mouthpiece and "mistakes were made" doesn't quite fill the bill.

Options: ReplyQuote
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In


Screen Name: 
Your Email (optional): 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   ********  **    **  **     **  **       
 **     **     **     ***   **  ***   ***  **       
 **     **     **     ****  **  **** ****  **       
 ********      **     ** ** **  ** *** **  **       
 **            **     **  ****  **     **  **       
 **            **     **   ***  **     **  **       
 **            **     **    **  **     **  ********