Posted by:
randyj
(
)
Date: June 16, 2015 11:13PM
"Man, you were a true Internet pioneer. AFAIK, readership didn't really pick up online until 2000 or maybe 2002."
I was earlier than a lot of people, but I'm no pioneer. We got our kids a computer for Christmas 1994. Before that, I didn't care anything about computers, the internet, or studying about Mormonism. I was already "over" the church because of my experiences in it. But my wife got us AOL early on, and she told me "Hey, there's some interesting stuff about the church on there." So I started dabbling a little, reading an article here and there. It was kinda funny: I didn't want my kids, who were still attending church at the time, to see that I was reading "anti-Mormon" stuff, so if one of them walked by the computer, I'd put my hands over the screen.
The more I read, the less true the church looked. Some of the early websites that I can remember reading were Mormons In Transition, the Tanners, rpcman's, stuff like that. In late 1996, I came across exmormon.org, and I saw that the server was in Chattanooga. I thought to myself, "Does the person who runs this live just 100 miles from me?" I found Eric K's phone number and called him and we got to know each other. We went to an Ex-Mo get-together in Chattanooga, and I began getting comfortable and interested in speaking out.
We went to the ward New Year's Eve party in 1996. I had been semi-active for years, so at that party, the bishopric and SP were falling over themselves to sit at our table where they could "fellowship" us back into full activity. By that time, I had already read so much on the 'net that I knew the church was crap, so their efforts to reel us back in were comical. We last attended meetings in April 1997, and we resigned in December 1998.
Around that same time, I discovered e-mail groups discussing Mormonism, and that's where I started debating the issues with TBMs. There were already some "antis" there at that time, but few of them were really well-versed in the details of the history etc. The TBMs could hold serve on the debates because they knew much more than the "antis." That's why I took it upon myself to learn enough about the church so that the TBMs couldn't "win" any arguments. I debated them until about 2004, when I'd said pretty much everything I had to say, and got tired of it.
Since that time, the TBMs have pretty much "lost the internet war," as Grant Palmer puts it. So I do feel some satisfaction in being a fairly early "anti" who was willing to meet the Mopologists head on. But the people who originally published the material, put it on websites, and created support groups are the real pioneers.