Is the defense of the most shocking and sordid details of the real life of Joseph's Myth and Bring'em Young.

Mormons start with the conclusion, that JS was a Prophet and the BoM is true, historical facts and the preponderance of evidence, do not matter to Mormons.

They will maintain their erroneous beliefs and keep singing the praises of an adulterer, despite not having any way to answer the obvious question,

"Where is the law that permitted JS and By to practice polyandry with their follower's wives?"

We, between us, can only find laws that condemn polyandry as adultery, starting with the 10 Commandments and ending with the Law of the Priesthood.(D&C 132:61)

Joseph Smith himself wrote it, but only published it 10 years after he started to practice, "the Principal" of 'marrying' the wives and teenage daughters of followers. At a minimum, he abused his obscene amount of power, to mind fuck his followers and literally cuckold them by raping their wives and daughters. So did Brigham. He bred with them like they were livestock. Mormons still pubslish the most racist, sexist, misogynist 19th Century bogus myths as the Word of God. D&C 132 refers to women who 'belong' to their (pretend) husbands for the night.

Brigham YOung did the same thing, just like Warren Jeffs. And Mormons name their universities after a guy who was more evil than Warren Jeffs?

In fact, Ive looked and never in all of human history, has any Western, Judeo Christian society ever written a law that permitted polyandry.

Despite the fact the Mormons own law governing plural marriage condemns polyandry in no uncertain terms.

Mormonism is the epitome of delusional: maintaining erroneous belief, despite superior evidence to the contrary.

Even when the evidence is published by the Corporation they represent!!!



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 07/28/2016 09:24PM by koriwhore.

Yeah, and Clinton and Eisenhower and Harding and JFK couldn't have had affairs, 'cause they were the President.

Right.

To paraphrase Nixon:

When the president does it, it's not wrong.

Conversely many early Church leaders thought Joseph Smith was
both a prophet and an adulterer.

Oliver Cowdery accused Joseph of "a filty, nasty affair" with
Fanny Alger, but still maintained that JS had translated the
Gold Plates. All three of the "Three Witnesses" considered
Joseph a fallen prophet--one who had at one time translated
gold plates by the gift and power of God, but who later began
to exercise "unrighteous dominion." Isn't there even a verse
in the D&C that says this is what tends to happen?

On the one hand the Morg says, "it must have been from God
because Joseph Smith did it." On the other hand it says, "hey,
prophets are mortal, they're not perfect."

There's two things I love about the Church: it's face.

baura Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oliver Cowdery accused Joseph of "a filty, nasty
> affair" with
> Fanny Alger, but still maintained that JS had
> translated the
> Gold Plates.

Sure, because to admit otherwise would be to implicate himself in a fraud.
Cowdery was willing to point out Smith's shortcomings, but he was still very interested in self-preservation.

baura Wrote:
> There's two things I love about the Church: it's
> face.


Love it.

+++ !

"Joseph Smith himself wrote it, but only published it 10 years after he started to practice, "the Principal"

In the interest of accuracy---Joseph Smith never published the "revelation on celestial marriage." In fact, he publicly denied that there was any such document or practice to the day he died.

After Smith's 1844 death, the LDS church continued to officially deny that they taught and practiced polygamy until they reversed themselves and admitted it in 1852. The "revelation on celestial marriage" was not published in the D&C until the 1876 edition. Before then, the only published, canonized form of marriage which was acceptable in the church was monogamy.