Posted by:
thedesertrat1
(
)
Date: June 23, 2018 04:11PM
In analyzing the cause-effect or behavioral consequence for the decline and fall of any cultlike organization it appears to me that the big problem is their non sustainable course of action. They demand of the members an unrealistic submission to unreasonable demands.
A good example of this is signing over all of the advocates material wealth to the organization. Or maybe demanding a donation of 10% of the member's gross revenue for full membership. This could also be the admission price to facilities for the performance of rituals.
This reflects back to what I label as the greed factor. Wherein the lust for gold overrides all other considerations and it becomes paramount to the onward surge of the cult.
Anything that disagrees with the current dogma must be demeaned, disparaged, denigrated, denied, and disposed of. Otherwise it could force a paradigmatic shift and thereby the creation of a new paradigm.
What happens with a cultlike operation is that they pursue this non sustainable course of action. In doing so they Rise, Peak, and Perish.
After peaking new members will still be added but those who leave and are therefore deleted from the population. They will be numerically small but will collectively inevitably overwhelm and consume the group thus enabling the demise thereof.