(Couldn't read the article because I don't want to disable my ad blocker.)

Didn't one of the brethren (Oaks?) say a while back not to say priesthood leaders are wrong, even when they are?

"It is wrong to criticize church leaders even if the criticism is true."

The woman's crime was "making others uncomfortable."

Ya know, if women hadn't been so long repressed & dis-respected in the LDS CULTure, this might get a bit more traction...

My first thought from your subject was whether he had a boner while holding his penis?

The Boner is in Canada.

Let me see if I can speak in genital terms, as does the OP.

How do you know the author is a penis holder (or priesthood holder)?

Rather than saying the vagina/clitoris holder should be quiet, I read him saying the vagina/clitoris holder should name the offender so it can be verified. Sounds reasonable to me, in our country of justice.

Do you really think only the penis holders object to vagina/clitoris holders baring their breasts? Are vagina/clitoris holders happy when other vagina/clitoris holders breastfeed openly in the church foyer?

That has not been my experience.

Anytime, anyone has a complaint about how the church has treated them. They are said to be either: 1. doing this only for attention, and 2. They are lacking in humility and should just basically shut up and do what they are told.

No reason is ever legitimate.