Posted by:
Elder Berry
(
)
Date: August 13, 2018 06:57PM
Loopholes.
"BYU changed it’s policies in 2017 with regard to sexual assault victims, so that they would be granted amnesty. If the school grants amnesty to honor code issues (such as the alcohol) what does that matter if her local bishop can withdraw his endorsement? It doesn’t make any sense.
Perhaps this loophole was overlooked when BYU made the policy change, but now that it’s exposed, it needs to change."
https://www.quora.com/Why-did-another-Mormon-victim-of-abuse-get-expelled-from-the-LDS-owned-BYU-Idaho-for-whistleblowingFunny how this one response is the most reasoned and rational. Most of the others are all protecting bishops.
I looked for it but couldn't find it. It was an article which quoted a judge in Utah saying in all his years on the bench he had never seen a bishop testify on behalf of a victim.
Such grand servants of their lord, these men.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/13/2018 06:58PM by Elder Berry.