Posted by:
RPackham
(
)
Date: February 25, 2020 03:11PM
D&C 121 says that the priesthood must be exercised ONLY in righteousness, and that if any man uses his priesthood to exercise "dominion" over another person in "any degree of unrighteousness," the heavens withdraw and his priesthood ends. Apparently it does not require any action from church authority - it's automatic and instantaneous.
Now look at Joseph Smith's dealings with Helen Kimball. He told her that by marrying him her entire family would be granted entry into the celestial kingdom. That promise was the reason she agreed to be sealed to him. But there is absolutely no scriptural or theological or revelatory basis for such a promise. It is an excellent example of using priesthood in unrighteous dominion. There was absolutely no justification for that promise. Helen would not have accepted except for Smith's using his priesthood standing to convince her.
That would clearly mean that Smith lost his priesthood the moment he tried to get Helen into his bed with that false promise.
If he also used his priesthood to seduce Fanny Alger, violating the requirement that taking any woman as plural wife must have the first wife's permission (D&C 132:61) he lost his priesthood much earlier.
That would mean that any man he ordained after he lost his priesthood was not ordained at all, nor could any of those men confer the priesthood on others.
And that would mean that a huge majority of Mormon men today, whose priesthood traces back to Joseph Smith after Smith had no priesthood,
have no priesthood authority after all.
For more problems this makes for Mormons, see my article on "Apostasy and Authority" at
http://packham.n4m.org/authority.htm