Posted by:
bag of chips
(
)
Date: February 12, 2021 09:50AM
So we all know how members struggled to get the church to accept resignation or name removal from the church's records. We also presume that the church does not remove people from their rolls just because they have moved or can not be located.
So here's a new twist to the possibility that the church is removing members or holding disciplinary council WITHOUT notifying members that said action is taking place.
I have siblings who have not been active in the church since the 1980s. They have not formally resigned and as recent as 2000, ward clerks have reached out to my parents about "giving up their addresses" so the church could sic missionaries and other leaders to hound them to return to the Mormon church.
A couple years ago, one of my siblings moved back home. My Mom did her Mormon duty and requested (through her ward's bishop) to request his/her membership record (which still existed in Y2K). A few weeks went by and this ward bishop told my Mom that my sibling's membership record did not exist. If he/she was interested in the church, then he/she would have to be rebaptized. Huh?
So what the heck happened through the years? Well, Prop 8 then the SCOTUS ruling in 2013 about same sex marriage. BTW, my sibling who I love dearly is gay/lesbian. He/she has been outspoken in the gay community and is visible in the pride section of social media.
Do you believe in serendipity? Sometimes, I do but not in this case. The timing of this action coincided when the church secretly changed its policy on the hateful/hurtful on the baptism of children of gays.
So did the bishop, stake president or some "higher council of men" cancel my sibling's membership?
Now another sibling of mine is downright antagonistic and even hostile towards any members of the church. He/she also left the church in the 1980s and apparently is considered a member in good standing because he/she was assigned a minister when the HT-VT thingy was changed. He/she wrote letters, made phone calls to demand to be left alone. The church replied that they would honor the request but that he/she was still expected to receive regular church messengers. This sibling is NOT gay.
Any thoughts?
-bag of chips