Posted by:
Lester Burnham
(
)
Date: May 13, 2013 11:55AM
Recent SLTribune article tell of the arrest of one Mike Driggs, a 62 year-old a registered sex offender from Sandy, Utah for alleged sex offenses with a young boy he met at church in 2004.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/56274733-78/driggs-police-sex-alleged.html.cspMaybe someone knows what happened to Mr. Driggs during the past 40 years or so, other than he was convicted as a sex offender in 1985 but we can shed some light on events prior to that, which may also illustrate interesting, but not surprising behavior within TSCC.
This is the same Michael Driggs who was a missionary in Brasil in the early 1970's. And the same Elder Driggs who was discovered with "inappropriate" relationships with young boys in the mission field. When this information came to light, he was sent away from Brasil---but none of the missionaries know where...a few of us int he Mission Presidency knew why. We had assumed he would be sent home and face Church discipline with a "dishonorable" discharge.
But Driggs, from wealthy and influential LDS Arizona family, was not sent home...he was sent to another mission in the U.S. How do we know? My close friend was his Zone leader in the Southern States where Driggs was transferred, directly from Brasil.
What happened to him there? He was, once again, discovered to be behaving inappropriately with little member boys, and was finally sent back to Arizona...just a little before his actual 2 years would have been up.
Was he disciplined? Was he turned over to appropriate authorities? We don't know for sure.
Maybe someone else can fill in the blanks....to help answer the question of whether the church should be in any way culpable in his eventual conviction...was Driggs a full-fledged member when he met this latest young victim at curch in and allegedly starting abusing him in 2004? We don't know...but we do know the Church had to have known of his past.
Thoughts?
Additional details by anyone from Sandy, Utah where Driggs lived/attended church?
Of course, the real question is whether an opportunity was missed within the church to avoid what appeared to be a life-long pattern of destructive behavior towards children?
And if so, why?