Posted by:
Truthseeker
(
)
Date: April 13, 2011 09:42AM
"So, as I read the multiple articles around many presidential candidates 2012, many I have never heard of, I cannot help but think one reason, and I think the biggest reason why the nation is headed for disaster is because our country is so fractionated today that the possibility of any one candidate taking a majority lead and win the candidacy, and may I add by the majority voting, is becoming very slim which means that the power sits with some small niche which means that the entire nation is in the hands of some small niche who may or may not know what is going on in the world and who may or may not have proper perspectives that would literally bring the nation to its knees.
This fictionalization I believe completely comes from the weakness of family units- do what you want to do, be who you want to be, lie a little, "who cares, just stay out of my hair. You are annoying". Few children are brought up in the manner the Lord desires with structure, love and righteous direction. They are led by their own devices.
As I read the articles on the internet I can then understand why I see people struggling to do all they can to build some sort of foundation in their life, to find some sort of certainty that they go to extreme lengths to achieve this "certainty" because they didnt or dont have proper, righteous family support. These extreme lengths taken by others to find comfort and solidarity to their life can be very devastating to others around them but can draw crowds and groups which form these small niches that have voice. These voices then gather together to nominate candidates like Donald Trump and certainly many others. The point being without the majority of Americans on a united front to vote in an individual who upholds the Lord and his standards, the possibilities are numerous as to who will win candidacy because of the fractionalized nation we have become and unfortunately will continue to become until the Lord comes.
Love you all!! M!ke"
I responded by telling him that we might be better off if all religiously affiliated candidates were barred from office because theocracy has never worked and suggested secular humanists were the ideal candidates.