I read this post earlier this morning, and I keep dwelling on it. Partly because I can relate to some of it.
It occurs to me that a framework of sorts might help to talk about the situation, and the one below is as good as any.
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs:
https://sketchplanations.com/maslows-hierarchySummarized from top to bottom (but numbered in the order they need to be satisfied):
5) Self-actualization -> inner fulfillment
4) Esteem -> self-worth, confidence, recognition
3) Social -> family, friendship, belonging
2) Safety -> personal security, resources
1) Physiological -> food, water, shelter, warmth.
In my own situation, my dad remarried when I was 17, and essentially went AWOL re. his four kids (quit paying child support, college, braces, etc). Unfortunately, because he'd fought my mom for custody of half the kids--like we were furniture--he was stuck with me. He grudgingly provided #1, and little more.
My mom provided #3 and #4 without reservation, but she could not provide #1 or #2.
What I really wanted was to go to college to move forward in life. My dad wouldn't provide it. My mom couldn't provide it.
All that to say that a healthy family situation ought to be providing #1 thru #4, a happy, healthy, nurturing environment, so that a child can thrive and successfully grow and transition to adulthood.
From your first couple sentences, I get the sense that you are frustrated with #3 & #4, which means you'll struggle with #5. And "Houston" may be the solution, or may not.
If you have #1 & #2, then it can be difficult/scary to let them go in order to move forward, even if #3 & #4 aren't there. I know this from my own experience, and other people I've known over there years (there are a lot of dysfunctional families out there).
It sounds like your bio-family is willing to provide the #1 thru #4, to facilitate #5, which would be great, but I'd caution you to be careful about that. I don't mean to cast aspersions on your bio family, but two things in your post stand out.
The first thing is the notion that this is a once in a lifetime opportunity. If a family is going to provide #1 thru #4, it should be constant, always, anytime, not just right now. Maybe I'm reading too much into that, and perhaps it's a FIRST in a lifetime opportunity. But that get's to the second thing, which is why do you have both a bio- and adoptive-family. I don't mean to be nosy, but hope that the circumstances are such that the bio-family truly can step up and provide #1 thru #4.
On a different note, I wouldn't put too much emphasis on place. The #1 thru #5 dynamic is the same everywhere. If moving will improve that dynamic for you, then do it. If not, then moving won't help.
For example, I went on a road trip with some friends in college, and we stayed a couple days in Jacksonville, FL with some friends of one the other guys. We were all working our way through our hometown college, and at least one of the friends in Jacksonville was doing the same, but he was complaining about all sorts of things, and said, "If I could just get the he|| out of this town..." Well, the group talked him into moving back to our hometown, so before long he was also back at our school. Fast forward a little, and he was complaining: "If I could just get the he|| out of this town... (again)". So, he had been unhappy in the hometown, and left for a "great" place. Then he was unhappy, and moved back home, because it was gonna be "great." But it wasn't, and he was itching to move off to some other "great" place.
My point is, it's not the place that's great. The circumstances have to be great.
Anyway, in my own situation, the way I finally was able to find #1 thru #4, so that I could move forward and find #5 was that I did a 3 year enlistment in the Army. I did it specifically to save up some money, and get the GI Bill for college, but in retrospect I realize that in their own way, they provided #1 thru #4. In the short term, they fed and housed me, paid me, provided a structure in which I could function and even thrive and grow if I had wanted to, etc. But, longer term, yeah, I left 3 years later with sizable savings and the GI Bill to help get through school.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying to go out and join the Army. But I am saying to look to satisfy #1 thru #4 in a way that's as stable and unwavering as possible. If the family arrangement does not work out, then there are other options, like the Peace Corps, Coast Guard, etc. Or perhaps even returning to SLC if the bridge is not burned.
EDIT to add: it looks like Done & Done his some of the same points while I was typing! I should have refreshed the page.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/20/2023 01:24PM by Gordon B. Stinky.