Posted by:
Lot's Wife
(
)
Date: November 10, 2023 05:59PM
Interesting points.
---------
> It reminds me of the Taoist appreciation for, and
> even preference, for imperfection. One of my art
> professors used to make us look for the bit of
> imperfection that was often purposefully added to
> Taoist-influenced art.
Confucian gardens/temples are boring because they attempt to create a cosmic harmony and balance that seems more aspirational than real. A tree to the left, a tree to the right. A pointy rock over there, a pointy rock over here. It's decidedly and sterilely unnatural.
I don't associate Taoist art with intentional imperfection, just natural imperfection, but it doesn't surprise me that some artists and experts would do so. But Chan/Zen gardens and bonsai are absolutely the way you say; in fact, if you look closely you can often see the tiny pieces of wire used to encourage plants to grow in unique ways. It's truly beautiful although it does raise the question whether that style of Zen is truly Zen.
---------------
> I also loved how the Taoist painters often made
> humans quite small in comparison to the grandeur
> of nature. Not only did we have to hunt for the
> imperfections, but often also for the humans.
I love that too. Not only does it put our species in perspective, it is also, and perhaps consequently, peaceful. To see humans as parts of a greater natural whole is deeply and emotionally healing. Tang Dynasty poetry strikes much the same note.
------------
> Find the people! Find an imperfection!
That brings us back to a frequent D&D point: appreciation of the vast range of differences between people rather than the need to standardize everything and everyone.
------------
>
https://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/humanities/images/> tangyin1a.jpg
I always thought that sort of Shanshui scenery was fantastic. Then I backpacked around China and saw the Li River (Guilin), the mountains of Yunnan, and the South China Sea, and realized that the natural scenery looks much like the paintings and carvings.
I wonder if Taoism would have put down roots in a society that was not used to looking at nature that way. Of course we are discussing the elite of the elite; 99.9% of Chinese never had enough rice let alone time to contemplate philosophy and nature, and today's China has virtually nothing to do with Taoist sensibilities.
I'm reminded of the great scholar Arthur Waley, who translated lots of beautiful Chinese literature but refused ever to visit China because he knew the 20th century reality bore no resemblance to the literary world he wanted to translate faithfully and without preconceptions.
But I ramble. . .