Posted by:
anybody
(
)
Date: November 30, 2023 01:58PM
'Oumuamua probably isn't an alien probe...but it did come from beyond our solar system. But it's a good study in scientific debate and evaluating competing theories based on the same phenomenon.
############
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2103/2103.05559.pdfAbstract
‘Oumuamua, the first known object of extrasolar origin seen to enter our Solar System,
has multiple unusual characteristics that, taken together, are very difficult to explain with
conventional astronomical entities like asteroids and comets. Consequently, it has been
hypothesized that ‘Oumuamua is an interstellar probe that was constructed by an alien
civilization. We demonstrate that the accomplishments that can be achieved with large
space telescopes/interferometers in the alien’s planetary system will completely quench
any motivation for construction and launch of an ‘Oumuamua-like probe. The absence of
any such motivation attests that ‘Oumuamua is not an alien creation. The existence of
large space telescopes has important implications for a range of topics that include
interstellar space travel, the Zoo Hypothesis, METI, and UFOs.
#################
Daily Beast article on the debate.
#################
https://www.thedailybeast.com/is-oumuamua-an-alien-probe-or-a-weird-comet-this-space-mystery-wont-endBergner objected to that characterization. She told The Daily Beast that scientists from many different fields are doing their best to understand ‘Oumuamua. “A lot of very novel and creative ideas have been proposed to try to explain its behavior.”
Roush conceded that the scientific establishment does have a “phobia of talking about extraterrestrials.” That phobia could work for skeptics such as Seligman and Bergner and against freethinkers such as Loeb. The former might be more likely to be taken seriously, even if their studies include basic flaws, like Loeb claimed.
“Personally I think Avi is more likely to be wrong than right about ‘Oumuamua,” Roush said. “But I will defend to the death any scientist's right to have their ideas heard respectfully and judged on the merits, even if they come with perceived cultural stigma.”
Brian Keating, a cosmologist at the University of California, San Diego, tried to stake out a middle ground between Loeb and the skeptics. They’re both doing important work, and in good faith.
Whichever side ultimately turns out to be correct—Loeb with his aliens hypothesis, the skeptics positing their odd comet—humanity stands to learn something new, Keating stressed. “If the object is a comet, it’s not as interesting,” he said, “but it still would be of note for astronomers because it isn’t like anything we’ve ever seen before.”