Posted by:
Nightingale
(
)
Date: February 06, 2024 06:11PM
My sister is on an interfaith committee and she invited me to a gathering last weekend. I mainly show up occasionally just to see her every now and then and to support her community efforts. She's not particularly religious. There were quite a few people there, from various countries and ethnicities, some of the women in their traditional dress. Representatives of various faiths stood in a semicircle at the front and each offered a brief comment or prayer related to their group’s beliefs and inspirations.
First, a young Jewish woman shared the basic principle of the Torah. The Muslim man standing beside her gave a prayer in his tradition. Given the current strife in the world between those two groups especially, the symbolism and peaceful nature of the encounter felt emotional and thought-provoking. As the young woman’s gaze met mine it felt as if she could read my thoughts and we nodded at each other. My eyes misted up. The next woman practices Jainism. She took her shoes off before giving a short prayer.
Beside her was an LDS woman. She’s the only one in the group that my sister mentions to me as I think they’re co-chairs and sis rolls her eyes about the LDS lady who comes across as a stern busybody. I’m not just saying that because she’s a Mormon. Ordinarily I’d be preaching that we can’t dislike a person just because they’re Mormon, or whatever.
Then there was a lay member of the United Church. He briefly mentioned that the United Church in Canada started as a mix of Methodist and Presbyterian faiths that he described as “unique to Canada”. He gave a short prayer asking for peace and harmony. I can get behind that request.
Then a Hindu man said that Hinduism is not a religion but a lifestyle. Interesting.
A Baháʼí lady slipped off her shoes before saying a prayer. She said they believe that all religions have the same source and that we have a lot more in common than not. (You wouldn’t know it the way some groups carry on, of course). She said that their foundation is unity and oneness – unity, peace and security.
The phrase ‘peace and security’ rocketed me for a moment back to my JW pals whose minds were always on the advent of Armageddon and one of their leaders’ main prophecies is “when they [world reps] are saying “peace and security” that is when Armageddon will occur. Well, they’ve been saying it for a good long while now and so far …crickets.
A First Nations rep said “we are as much alive as we keep the earth alive” – that sounded more poetic when he said it – maybe I am misremembering the exact wording. But, of course, he meant we have got to take care of the earth.
A Sikh rep said “I am a stranger to no-one and no-one is a stranger to me”. Nice thought.
So now back to the LDS speaker. First, she went longer than most. I must acknowledge that perhaps I have a bit of a negative attitude when it comes to the Mormons but even so it’s accurate to say she wasn’t all that inspiring. At all. In fact, me being me, I kind of felt sorry for her even so. She read a LONG address that I vaguely recognized. She literally read it word for word and never looked up at the (small) audience or altered her cadence or gave it any expression. Although my mind wandered for a bit while she was speaking by the time she was getting to the end I heard my brain say to itself “Oh no, please…” and I realized that maybe she was reading something about the first vision. It just seemed so tone deaf when everybody else was referencing ecumenicalism and here was the Mormon reading about all the churches being wrong. You have to laugh, or something. And at the end of the reading she stated the source of the (long) passage: "Joseph Smith Jr". I nearly laughed. I guess that’s disrespectful. And I know that many readers here would think it’s all a crock so why bother measuring whose prayer or reading was the biggest pile of hooey.
It’s just that the intent of the meeting and the tenor of it was to find our commonalities and to be inspiring. The reading she selected didn’t do that, at least for me. Maybe not surprisingly.
Joseph Smith doesn’t seem to measure up, at all, in that company representing founders and adherents who try to find common connections or at least tried not to trumpet out their own superiority and uniqueness. Because we can dress differently, speak various languages, hail from various corners of the world and yet find many things we share in common.
The LDS lady never made eye contact with the audience and never smiled. Maybe she just has that gruff officious manner in a setting like that. Too bad – all it did was remind me of the dull, dry, humourless, uninspiring Mormon meetings I was so happy to turn my back on.
Maybe she was nervous speaking in public. Perhaps she thought her message was less inspiring than the others. Or maybe she’s just miserable in her life situation. It’s too bad.
And all I can say, again, is how very thrilled I am that I quit attending those dull meetings where I found it difficult to make friends and never thought I measured up to their expectations (although I was clueless as to what those were, other than it was my “duty” to get married - uh...). I didn’t find it very appealing, at all.
It’s not a good feeling.
Meanwhile, I also don’t plan on pursuing relationships with any of the people I met on Saturday. It was interesting but I am done with joining. The best part of the event was that nobody was expecting anybody to jump ship and join another crowd. It was all about being just fine with who you are and what you are doing and so is everybody else. We can have commonalities but be different. And that’s OK. In fact, desirable.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/06/2024 06:15PM by Nightingale.