Recovery Board  : RfM
Recovery from Mormonism (RfM) discussion forum. 
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Posted by: S.H. ( )
Date: February 21, 2018 04:16PM

Dec 29, 1912 Front page of New York Times



http://utlm.org/onlineresources/nytimes1912papyrus.htm

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: paisley70 ( )
Date: February 21, 2018 06:03PM

After the fraud of JS's translation came to light, Bishop Spalding of the LDS church predicted the church's future demise. Why is it taking so long? It is because they continue to revile scholarship!

"Bishop Spalding hasn't much hope of reaching the ordinary variety of faithful Mormon who "sustains the authorities" in all things, including politics and tithing offering, with his little pamphlet of exposure. But he hopes that Mormons who have been trained in the universities and have some conception of the integrity of scholarship and the inscrutability of evidence, such as that presented in the Egyptian collection at the Metropolitan Museum, will have open hearts, and so will receive the plain truth presented to them. The breaking up of Mormonism through the desertion of the intelligent part of its membership is the future for the Prophet Smith's church which Bishop Spalding foresees. It is for that reason that he prefers to address the Mormons as his friends rather than to attack them.

"Advance copies of Bishop Spalding's exposure of the Mormon prophet's translations, when they reached the dignitaries of the Mormon Church, caused something more than the stir that might normally have been expected. The official newspaper of the Church, The Deseret Evening News, spent its entire editorial page reviling scholars and scholarship. Brigham H. Roberts, the best known scholar of the Church, and its chief living defender, publicly thanked Bishop Spalding for the moderation of tone characterizing his work and for its scholarly and judicial spirit.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: ificouldhietokolob ( )
Date: February 21, 2018 06:37PM

Um...Franklin Spalding ("Bishop Spalding") was never a member of the LDS church.

He was an Episcopalian Bishop.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Spencer_Spalding

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: paisley70 ( )
Date: February 21, 2018 09:47PM

Well, that makes more sense. I shouldn't skim over so quickly. I seriously thought that there was an enlightened Bishop in the LDS church at one point in time. I guess I am delightfully mistaken!

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: GregS ( )
Date: February 22, 2018 11:13AM

Perfectly understandable. When I hear or read "bishop", I still imagine bishops from my Catholic youth.

Likewise, "elders" and everybody older than me that my parents told me I had to always respect.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: ificouldhietokolob ( )
Date: February 22, 2018 04:43PM

paisley70 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I seriously thought that there was an
> enlightened Bishop in the LDS church at one point
> in time. I guess I am delightfully mistaken!

Haha, you're so funny!
An enlightened LDS Bishop!
That's a good one!

:)

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Babyloncansuckit ( )
Date: February 22, 2018 01:21AM

If all of the intelligent people left the church, how could you tell?

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: anybody ( )
Date: February 21, 2018 06:47PM

It was a fraud in the beginning
It was then and ever shall be
Fraud without end
Amen, Amen

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: lilburne ( )
Date: February 21, 2018 06:54PM

The good news is the LDS main group is in decline. it is now a large but dying cult. And that is what it is now, a cult since it denies all forms of evidence against it, stands against mainstream science where science has no vested interest in LDS claims, and continues to push a morphing agenda either concealing, lying, or whitewashing its past.

Unfortunately the US will have to face having circa half a million increasing loony fundamentalist people living in Utah as mormonism splits into those who are social mormons and those who actually believe the lies and fight for it.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: bobofitz ( )
Date: February 21, 2018 09:45PM

Thank you for this. As the article explained, the format of the facsimiles was the later version of the three used by the Egyptians and was dated long after Abraham was supposed to have lived. This debunks one of the apologist arguments that ancie

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: bobofitz ( )
Date: February 21, 2018 09:54PM

.....oops, computer malfunction. Had to use my backup.... The fact that the format used for the facsimiles post dated the time that Abraham was alive debunks the apologists argue net that the Egyptians often used old manuscripts over and told different stories using other, older document for convenience. I heard this one one of the apologist videos on the Book of Abraham on YouTube.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: azsteve ( )
Date: February 22, 2018 10:47PM

Didn't the real language experts (real non-mormon language scholars using only science) just recently fully crack the language used in the Book of Abraham, and literally translate everything there, only to find that those writings had no resemblance to what the Mormon church says it said?

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Lot's Wife ( )
Date: February 22, 2018 11:33PM

Not recently.

The Rosetta Stone was discovered in 1799. Hieroglyphs were decoded over time, but by the late 19th century the language was easy enough for experts to read with reasonable accuracy.

What you are probably thinking about is the discovery in 1966 of the actual texts, which were thought to have been destroyed by fire in 1871. It wasn't long before the BoA texts were translated by Egyptologists and found to be common funerary texts.

The next stage was that tendentious effort by Nibley, who, confronted by the mundane nature of the texts, contrived the notion that the documents were written in a hidden code. When that code was properly read, it revealed--voila--the Book of Abraham. That was probably the moment that Nibley lost the last of his faith in Mormonism and became entirely venal. His life must have been quite unpleasant from that point onward.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: ificouldhietokolob ( )
Date: February 23, 2018 03:44PM

Yep.
But let's not forget that *long* before the papyrii were discovered (as early as 1856), Egyptologists translated the "facsimiles" published in the BoA, and already knew they were common funerary texts...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_appraisal_of_the_Book_of_Abraham#Early_criticism_of_the_facsimiles

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: TX Rancher ( )
Date: February 24, 2018 02:51AM

Crazy that the fraud was exposed so long ago, yet so many have fallen for it since.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: paisley70 ( )
Date: February 24, 2018 03:38AM

Amen. I am feeling like a dipshit ex-Mormon every day of my life. There is no excuse now, considering the advent of the internet.

The Millenials will bring the church to its knees with their exodus. Stemming from their discoveries in the historicity of the LDS church.

The white General Authorities will have a lot to think about when Mormonism suddenly becomes a predominantly African religion. All other geopolitical boundaries of the church are set for downfall due to internet access. Except Africa. The "brethren" know this.

Let the dominoes cascade freely from this point going forward...

Options: ReplyQuote
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In


Screen Name: 
Your Email (optional): 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  ******    ********    *******   **    **  **    ** 
 **    **   **     **  **     **   **  **   ***   ** 
 **         **     **  **     **    ****    ****  ** 
 **   ****  ********    ********     **     ** ** ** 
 **    **   **     **         **     **     **  **** 
 **    **   **     **  **     **     **     **   *** 
  ******    ********    *******      **     **    **