...over-billed its Cash-Cow Client for "legal" services rendered???
And/Or can somebody explain to me just what might constitute the legal definition of "Misappropriation" of tithing funds if any creative billing were to occur???
the top guys at ChurchCo and the top guys at KM, nobody would call it "over-billing" and nobody would be the wiser. When you look at the swindling, rent-seeking, self-serving profiteering that Brigham Young engaged in as a matter of course, it's not much of a stretch to imagine that a fairly small group of well-connected families and companies close to the Q15 could be making out like bandits--especially when you consider how careful the ChurchCo leaders are to prevent any kind of transparency.
With multiple vacation homes, he benefits from the opacity. Most of the insulated corporate types are actually political liberals. Suppression of financial data, which would be criminal in a publicly traded corporation, is a great way to profess fake concern for poor people or refugees while indulging in private luxury.
While I don't consider Dieter a swindler, that setup is a swindler's dream. Someone has got to be milking it for hundreds of millions every year.
"Someone has got to be milking it for hundreds of millions every year."
Seriously no doubt "H"...especially when you also consider ALL the misappropriation of tithing $$$ that trickles down through by nepotism alone to construction companies and all of those ancillary construction services involved just in that part of the building up of the Lard's Kingdom via LDS-INC.
Without Financial transparency the sky's the limit with these CROOKS!!!
I am fairly certain that the the church bureaucracy makes sure that the church pays top dollar for services with a generous bonus. I can't imagine K-M nickle and dime-ing the church for every service and fee. Probably, one giant amount that covers "the works."
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/17/2019 11:27AM by messygoop.
BeenThereDunnThatExMo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- can somebody explain to me just what might constitute the legal definition of "Misappropriation" of tithing funds if any creative billing were to occur???
The disclaimer at he bottom of the tithing slip guarantees that misappropriation cannot occur.
"Though reasonable efforts will be made to use donations as designated, all donations become the Church's property and will be used at the Church's sole discretion to further the Church's overall mission."