We KNOW that the president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, even Russell M. Nelson, is a true prophet of God. How do we know that he is a prophet? Because he revealed the heretofore unknown truth from the Almighty that God himself is offended when people use the word “Mormon” in reference to his one true, restored church. How do we know that “Mormon” is truly offensive to God? Because it was revealed to us by a true prophet of God.

Check and mate, you deceived apostates!

Posted by: CrispingPin ( )


"We KNOW that the president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, even Russell M. Nelson, is a true prophet of God. How do we know that he is a prophet? Because he revealed the heretofore unknown truth from the Almighty that God himself is offended when people use the word “Mormon” in reference to his one true, restored church. How do we know that “Mormon” is truly offensive to God? Because it was revealed to us by a true prophet of God."
----

Well, it took long enough to get to this point.


What---none of the previous prophets were aware of this offense?

All prophets have their mission. Ezra Taft Benson promoted the Book of Mormon. Gordon B. Hinckley built temples throughout the world. Nelson’s job is to reveal God’s pet peeves.

He married Wendy. Isn't that proof enough?

She’s his little rock and roll, uh huh.

She's his Urethra and Thumbin'.

Perfect momo circular logic to prove the church is true

A circle has no end, nor does the eternal gospel.

Its only crazy from outside their circle of truth.

because... He SAYS so! And he's a prophet! No circular logic here, fortunately.

He is a prophet because he is sustained as such. The Hinkster said so.

Millions of Mormons can't be wrong...

TMC is in apostasy.
RMN is a robot.
And I'm a pro fit.

Two of these are true.
And how about you?

He is sustained as such... nuf said

My friend Wilbur had been looking for a sign that would prove to him that Gordon B. Hinckley was a real prophet.

Then one day Hinckley was asked on TV whether he was a real prophet and Hinckley said that he was "sustained as such."

Wilbur came to me and said that he thought that maybe that was the proof he was looking for.

So I asked him: "Who sustains him as a prophet?"

"The members of the church do," he replied.

Then I asked: "Why do the members of the church sustain him as a prophet?"

"Because he is a prophet," he replied.

I finally asked: "But how do the members know that he is a prophet of god?"

"Because he told them that he is sustained as such" was Wilbur's thoughtful reply. Wilbur said that he got goosebumps when he realized that everything had come around in a perfect circle in which everything in the circle supported everything else in the circle.

So I patted Wilbur on his propeller beanie (being careful to avoid the spinning propeller) and said: "Well, there you go, Wilbur. The logic is impeccable. You've got yerself a real, genyooine prophet."

Wilbur was so happy that he immediately went to the temple to practice his heavenly handshakes and buy some new church-issued underwear.

The proof is in the pudding. (did you not know that Rusty has a dish nightly, soon is snoring and a little later, sits up, nudges Wendy who begins to write down his rivoting revs)

So after I used the saying, "The proof is the pudding," my curiosity was roused and I needed to find out the origin, meaning of this saying.

The original saying is, "The proof of the pudding is in the tasting of the pudding" which fits rather nicely with Rusty who leaves (in my opinion) an unsavory taste on the palate from his "propheting">