Posted by:
Pompous Windbag
(
)
Date: March 09, 2019 12:19PM
The UCL test results came to its tiny bit of prominence in a Daily Mail Online article in 2012, possibly because the results were basically clickbait: "Oh, yer a rebel 'cuz yer lateral orbitofrontal cortex is a wee bit small !!"
If you were a social engineer in the pay of the prevailing culture, you'd most likely advise your paymasters to test lateral orbitofrontal cortices and to eliminate any of those who didn't have a fully grown "sheep" lateral orbitofrontal cortex.
Not having any familiarity with even my own lateral orbitofrontal cortex, I asked Google to give me a dumbed down explanation regarding what is known of this segment of the brain. Here's where Google led me:
"Adaptive behavior requires integrating prior with current information to anticipate upcoming events. Brain structures related to this computation should bring relevant signals from the recent past into the present. Here we report that rats can integrate the most recent prior information with sensory information, thereby improving behavior on a perceptual decision-making task with outcome-dependent past trial history. We find that anticipatory signals in the orbitofrontal cortex about upcoming choice increase over time and are even present before stimulus onset. These neuronal signals also represent the stimulus and relevant second-order combinations of past state variables. The encoding of choice, stimulus and second-order past state variables resides, up to movement onset, in overlapping populations. The neuronal representation of choice before stimulus onset and its build-up once the stimulus is presented suggest that orbitofrontal cortex plays a role in transforming immediate prior and stimulus information into choices using a compact state-space representation."
--
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms14823Now what the heck would the Daily Mail make out of that? I'm going to have to admit that their last sentence-conclusion
If the UCL study cited in the 2012 Daily Mail Online article is of any real import (based on a study of 20 people), there doesn't seem to be any such indication. Here's the link to that article:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2103859/Are-hard-wired-rebellious-How-brain-controls-fit-crowd.html#comments (By the way, UCL is University College London.)
Also, the thrust of the OP's cited source is that Mormonism creates "a special angst" and that "This would be an explanation as to how Utah has such a strong and distinct underground counterculture." Some angst is special and the rest of the angst aren't?
But the correlation I'd like to take away from this is that people with fully developed lateral orbitofrontal cortices 'fail' to develop herd mentality, and will opt out of herd behavior when they feel there is a reason to do so. It might be that a fully developed lateral orbitofrontal cortex simply creates a compliant herd animal.
Anyway, how small is YOUR lateral orbitofrontal cortex? I have standards, you know.