Posted by:
Elder Berry
(
)
Date: July 03, 2019 02:05PM
As a victim of childhood abuse I would like the parties involved like The BSA, The LDS Church, my abuser to acknowledge that they did something wrong.
It will never happen.
So when I read this non-apology I wondered if it would have killed him to just apologize for what he did.
" “It’s clear that any kind of apology I can make is meaningless at this point,” Van Wagenen said. “So I am not even going to attempt one. I want you all to know I feel the consequences of what I’ve done. I feel them deeply.” "
https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/celebrity/sundance-co-founder-sterling-van-wagenen-sentenced-for-child-sex-abuse/ar-AADMl1TMy father molested my adopted sisters and he never apologized or even acknowledged to me and a few siblings I spoke to that he did it and was sorry for it.
I don't know if Mormonism teaches this - non-apologetic acknowledgement and non-acknowledgement - but as a victim it hurts to see this behavior.
As a father I've had conflicts with my kids and wife over my own refusal to apologize. Where I feel I haven't done something worth apologizing I'm adamant about not apologizing. Often, my family wanted me to acknowledge that I hurt their feelings. It could have just been how I presented myself and not the content of what I was saying.
I know that institutionally people seem to think apology is acknowledgement of wrong doing. Sometimes it isn't but acknowledgement of the hurt caused. So I don't understand how Sterling Van Wagenen can think telling people how he can "feel the consequences" is better than an apology and how it is "meaningless." It sounds like the confession of man more hurt by the "consequences" and the hurt of his victims is "meaningless" to him. The old remorse because he got caught.
And this is what LDS Corp probably thinks as well. Damn the individuals hurt by their actions or lack of action but lick wounds, change policies, and keep paying their lawyers and PR people.