Posted by:
schrodingerscat
(
)
Date: March 09, 2024 01:08PM
[|] Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Most far out theories never get proven and remain
> far out. I will remind you of the Galileo Gambit
> and Sagan quote here
>
>
https://www.exmormon.org/phorum/read.php?2,2464753> ,2464760#msg-2464760
>
> Black holes were more than speculation. They were
> predicted by general relativity whose validity was
> pretty well validated by Eddington in 1919 via his
> observations of the bending of light during a
> solar eclipse.
>
> In fact, in 1916 Schwartzchild produced a solution
> to the field equations of relativity that
> corresponded to a non-rotating black hole. Between
> then and 1965, similar solutions were found for
> elactrically charged non-rotating black holes,
> rotation black holes, and electrically charged
> rotating black holes by Reissner, Nordstrom, Kerr
> and Newman.
>
> The original concept of a black hole dates to the
> late 18th century and John Michell and Pierre
> Laplace, so black holes were more than speculation
> before Penrose.
>
> The foist observation of black holes was the
> discovery of quasars in the 1960s, although it was
> not understood what quasars were at that time.
> Observational evidence of black holes was also
> provided by gravitational lensing by 1979.
>
> Asa an aside, Penrose only showed that if general
> relativity holds at all scales, black holes must
> contain a singularity. Most physicists today do
> not accept that premise to be true - as has been
> pointed out to you several times.
>
> This idea might prove to be true, and it may not.
> But at the present time, it is very speculative.
>
> And I would again point out that it has not yet
> been peer reviewed.
I saw that.
I just quoted the article, which I thought was interesting, although speculative, like EVERY other black hole theory, even the ones that win Nobel Prizes.
You think THAT was word salad you should read what NASA has to say about Lambda, the Cosmological Constant,
https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/education/graphic_history/#:~:text=%CE%9BCDM%20assumes%20that%20the%20universe,acceleration%20in%20the%20Hubble%20expansion.
“Assumptions
This model is a mathematical parameterization of Big Bang cosmology, as described by General Relativity and the Friedman-Lemaître-Roberson-Walker (FLRW) equations. ΛCDM assumes that the universe is composed of photons, neutrinos, ordinary matter (baryons, electrons) and cold (non-relativistic) dark matter, which only interacts gravitationally, plus "dark energy", which is responsible for the observed acceleration in the Hubble expansion. Dark energy is assumed to take the form of a constant vaccuum energy density, referred to as the cosmological constant (Λ). Standard (6 parameter) ΛCDM further imposes the constraint that space is flat (Euclidean).“
If Alpha, the fine structure constant, 1/137, were 10% more or less, atoms wouldn’t form.
Perhaps the fine structure constant only forms atoms at 1/500th the speed of light, 600km/s, which just so happens to be the speed we’re headed towards the Great Attractor. And by, ‘we’, I mean our whole region of the cosmos, Laneakea, immeasurable sky.
https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/c/Cosmic+Microwave+Background+DipoleEdited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/09/2024 01:09PM by schrodingerscat.