Recovery Board  : RfM
Recovery from Mormonism (RfM) discussion forum. 
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Posted by: CrispingPin ( )
Date: July 11, 2024 01:03PM

It’s still a year wait, right?

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Brother Of Jerry ( )
Date: July 11, 2024 01:18PM

I believe that can only be done if an immediate family member is LDS and submits the request. Otherwise, they get to cool their heels for 110 years after date of death. At that point, anyone who knew the deceased will also be dead, and can’t complain about them getting dead-dunked.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: elderolddog ( )
Date: July 11, 2024 01:56PM

    BofJ, I thought the "110-year" interregnum commenced with the date of birth, not the date of death.

    If I'm wrong, ... oops!

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: GNPE ( )
Date: July 11, 2024 04:02PM

Right-O again, EOD! Congratulate yourself (with LW's permission, that is)

the 110 thing is when a member who has gone AWOL is presumed to be dead & 'not counted' as a member anymore....

Yeah Right.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: [|] ( )
Date: July 11, 2024 04:22PM

EOD is correct

https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/general-handbook/28?lang=eng


28.1
General Guidelines for Performing Proxy Ordinances

"Except as noted in 28.3, proxy ordinances may be performed for all deceased persons as soon as 30 days have passed from their date of death if either of the following applies:

A close relative of the deceased (undivorced spouse, adult child, parent, or sibling) submits the name for temple ordinances.

Permission to perform the ordinances is received from a close relative of the deceased (undivorced spouse, adult child, parent, or sibling).

If neither of the above conditions applies, proxy temple ordinances may be performed 110 years after the deceased person was born."

https://broadcast.lds.org/elearning/FHD/Local_Support/Consultant/Temple_Policy-Name_Submissions/resources/assets/fil/z00001w00000000000a0/Name-Policies-lesson-handout.pdf

"If you are not one of the closest living relatives, you must obtain permission to submit the name of any
individual born less than 110 years ago."

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: CrispingPin ( )
Date: July 11, 2024 04:37PM

Not like the good old days when Elvis’ temple work was done hundreds of times.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: elderolddog ( )
Date: July 11, 2024 04:45PM

    It was kind of nice to know that Elvis might buy you a drink in the CK should you happen to run into him while out and about on the roads paved with gold and precious stones...

    Mormonism used to be a lot more fun!

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: summer ( )
Date: July 12, 2024 05:31PM

Elvis might enjoy all of the white and gilt decoratons.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Brother Of Jerry ( )
Date: July 12, 2024 10:57AM

Hmmm. Thanks for the clarification. It does seem a little odd, in that if the deceased lived to a ripe old age, it is entirely possible that a sibling might still be alive when the 110th birthday rolls around (sibling born late in the parents' marriage) and likely that a child might still be alive.

I suppose they just wanted to be consistent with the rule that a person is counted as a member until the church is notified of the person's death, or, in the case of no notification of death, until age 110, when the person can be presumed dead with very high probability. That of course allows the church to claim someone as a member for decades after their likely death, as long as they are inactive members and nobody tells the church that person has died.

This is Mormondom's most obvious way of cooking the membership books.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/12/2024 10:57AM by Brother Of Jerry.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: slskipper ( )
Date: July 11, 2024 05:49PM

But she was famous. That means she's special. The normal rules do not apply.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: GNPE ( )
Date: July 11, 2024 07:30PM

slskipper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> But she was famous. That means she's special. The
> normal rules do not apply.


'We don't need no stinking rules!'

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: heartbroken ( )
Date: July 11, 2024 08:23PM

Transplendent!

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Dave the Atheist ( )
Date: July 12, 2024 02:21AM

Her "work" will be done at 7-11. Yup. I got my free slurpy today.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Mormon Adjacent Lurker ( )
Date: July 12, 2024 05:38AM

More importantly, did someone remember to tell Dave?

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: bradley ( )
Date: July 12, 2024 03:42PM

Yup



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/12/2024 03:44PM by bradley.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Soft Machine ( )
Date: July 13, 2024 04:30PM

She was a wonderful actress in some wonderful films. Anyone remember Altman's Popeye? A brilliant film.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: dagny ( )
Date: July 13, 2024 04:38PM

Yes! She was a perfect fit for Olive Oyl.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Margie ( )
Date: July 13, 2024 06:16PM

Soft Machine Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> She was a wonderful actress in some wonderful
> films. Anyone remember Altman's Popeye? A
> brilliant film.


One of my favorite films is "3 Women", also by Altman.

Options: ReplyQuote
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In


Screen Name: 
Your Email (optional): 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   **      **  ********  ********  **      ** 
 **     **  **  **  **  **           **     **  **  ** 
 **     **  **  **  **  **           **     **  **  ** 
 **     **  **  **  **  ******       **     **  **  ** 
 **     **  **  **  **  **           **     **  **  ** 
 **     **  **  **  **  **           **     **  **  ** 
 ********    ***  ***   ********     **      ***  ***