No one either can or will address this issue?: 1. If the spirit joins the fetus at the point of conception then isn't all abortion murder? 2. If the spirit doesn't join the body until birth then isn't all abortion irrelevant? The only thing I am taught for sure is that we all lived in the "Spirit World" before life on earth.
Like many other concepts of any religion it appears this can't be proved. Don't I have to go on the basis of faith. Can you help those who do believe in this existence by now considering issues 1 and 2?
If you are going on the basis of faith then you can choose anything you want to be true. Pick option 1. Pick option 2. Anything you want to be true can be true with faith!
Un-knowable. No one can address it so no one should. Doesn't stop them though and they are sure they are right.
If there were a spirit world for god's billions of children it would be the equivalent of a fish hatchery. Farmed spirits. I like to think I was "wild caught".
And this spirit "war in heaven" thing is just too absurd to even fathom. Every story needs a good guy and bad guy to be viable and the ancient story tellers figured that out right from the beginning. It's Lucifer that makes the Bible stories work, not Jesus.
If you think about infant mortality rates through history,
and
you think about the doctrine of salvation for children under 8
(The King Follet Discourse is the source of the infants on thrones of glory statement) There will be many billions more guaranteed celestial glory through early death than will ever have lived to adulthood.
God is the greatest abortionist ever. 3/4 of conceptions do not achieve term just through natural losses without humans getting involved in abortion.
I was taught one third of pregnancies are spontaneously aborted, but whatever the number, it's a huge amount.
My mother had an ectopic pregnancy that had to be aborted in order to save her life. But I suppose the religious whack-a-doodles would have denied her that.
Benji123, you make a good point. It is a good gotcha question for the churches that are trying to pretend they know when some invisible spirit is supposed to zip into someone's uterus.
(I wonder if the zygote's spirit says hi to the mom's spirit. LOL)
If they are making stuff up about a spirit world, it's no surprise they would have pretzel logic about abortions too.
I like how the church says people are punished for their own sins, and not the sins of their father. Then, they had to ignore that and say abortion is OK if due to a rape or incest (definitely a sin of the father).
I don't think many here are likely to respond to your demand to answer your question seriously. If part of your premise involves made up stuff, it's all hypothetical gymnastics. Anyone can make up stuff "that can't be proved."
I Agree with everyone here. Even since leaving, my views have changed (somewhat) on birth. I was a preemie, and I was born relatively early when kids were not supposed to be born, because of lack of health equipment.
My opinion, is that of the church, the spirit enters the body upon first breath. Of course, it can't be proven.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 01/22/2025 11:21AM by lousyleper.
>> 1. If the spirit joins the fetus at the point of conception then isn't all abortion murder?
>>2. If the spirit doesn't join the body until birth then isn't all abortion irrelevant?
Abortion has nothing to do with a spirit...whatever that may be.
It has to do with when life begins. Religious folks like to say that life starts at conception. Lets see what their favorite books says shall we?
Genesis 2:7
"The Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being"
So, first god created Adams body, at that point Adam wasn't "alive".
Then god breaths into Adams nose and he becomes alive....I hope god didn't have bad breath!
Seems pretty clear to me.... If you take gods word for it, humans are only alive when they start breathing. If god would have decided to scrap his plan of creating humans, he could have just left Adams body in dust he created it from and he wouldn't have "killed" Adam because Adam was not alive at that point.
"The only thing I am taught for sure is that we all lived in the "Spirit World" before life on earth."
I was taught that Santa delivered presents in a flying sleigh pulled by flying reindeer.
Isn't being taught your problem? What if someone else from teaches you something different? The answers are inside you, so look there.
Suppose you reframe the question in terms of reincarnation. It's a remapping of the same story from linear time to cyclical time.
The legalistic distinction between abortion and murder is academic in a culture that pays lip service to human rights but treats its humans worse than animals.
When I was active, I taught an EQ meeting from one of the prophets manuals of that time. It was one the early prophets, probably number 4 or 5. But he said, and the manual quoted him that the next life is just like this life.
So yes, celestial mormons will still set up and take down chairs. And teach repetitive lessons.
Kind of sorry I ever asked this question. Apparently you ex's are of no help. Never had the nerve to ever bring up this topic with the brethren. Of course the brethren must have hoped it would never come up either. Guess I'll look for a sight with more TBMs. Thanks for your efforts.
You have a lot of assumptions on the topic that you hold on to.
You can't justify those assumptions. You accept them on faith.
The soul/spirit is an assumption with no actual supporting evidence. Sure, there are lots of stories that people impute to mean a soul, but those too are packed with assumptions that their faith leads them to interpret the event as a soul. But stories like that aren't evidence.
You want us to construct a doctrinal argument to support one or the other based on assumptions we don't share.
Hinkley said we don't know when the soul enters the body. So we err on the side of caution. Does that satisfy your reasoning? That's as doctrinal as it gets on the topic.
Your question, Benji123, is naive. You are looking for doctrine in a church that has none.
The Bible says spirit/life was breathed into the body at birth, but in Jeremiah God says he knew the eventual prophet in the womb, implying that an embryo is a spiritual as well as physical entity. The scripture can be read as supporting either position.
The LDS church had no stance on abortion until the late 1930s. Since then it has had a "doctrine" based on the same scriptures that previously supported no doctrine.
You can bring up any argument you want with church leaders and none of it will matter at all. You are to do what the church tells you to do and not worry your pretty little head about doctrine.
That's why at least some of us did not engage. Where there is no doctrine other than obedience to the teachings of the moment, there is no purpose in arguing about how many angels fit on the head of a needle.
They won't even engage on your topic.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 01/28/2025 03:10PM by Lot's Wife.
The problem Benji is that your question has either no answer or many, many answers.
If you are looking for an answer based on objective evidence, there is no answer. If you are looking for answers based on belief or opinion, there are many, many answers.
Even limiting the question just to mormonism has the same problem.
If you are looking for the official church position, they don't have one. If you are looking for the opinions of individual mormons, you will get many, many different answers.
His question failed to elicit the response he sought and he was disappointed by that. Is it not presumptuous of you to tell him he is wrong to feel let down?
And yes, your metaphysical queries are indeed like a strip club. You want to discuss the color of the overalls you insist the pole dancers are wearing and everyone else just rolls their eyes.
But by all means, keep doing your truth.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 01/28/2025 06:25PM by Lot's Wife.
Another thing to consider, as possible evidence that the spirit enters the baby at birth, is post-partum psychosis which affects 0.1% of mothers.
Suppose psychosis is a form of demonic possession. At birth, maybe an interdimensional portal opens along with the birth canal, allowing the spirit to enter the baby. You could get an interloping demon along for the ride, sneaking into mama and causing all kinds of havoc.
I may be spreading my jam a bit thin on this one, but for the sufficiently open-minded or Mormonly credulous, it just might do.
I see possibilities here. Perhaps strobe lights that trigger seizures are really portals to the underworld. This could develop into a pretty good side hustle for Father Damien.
Just keep your unicorns away from my Fairies! They always pester them to go out for a ride. Just give them some purple carrots and they will settle right down.