Posted by:
PtLoma
(
)
Date: August 06, 2011 08:07PM
I am a physician and a NeverMo. I have performed roughly half a dozen physicals for missionaries. (all of these had been my patients as teenagers and now needed me to complete the medical report---I was not performing physicals on people I didn't know, or whose parents I didn't know). I live in CA in an area that is 2% LDS (southern Orange County), but there are no LDS family practitioners or internists (I am the latter) in area area of over one million inhabitants (lots of dentists, and some LDS in areas like Dermatology that keep regular hours).
The form is about eight pages long and will be reviewed by the Medical Review Committee of the church. On page one there is a release of information section that the applicant must sign. As I recall, the applicant releases the information to the Review Committee, but NOT to the church at large. Big difference between the two, since this means the local leaders cannot be given the info without violating the HIPAA laws, which govern medical privacy. The MTC Medical Review panel is composed of retired LDS physicians.
About 3/4 of the form deals with physical issues: history, physical exam, immunizations, TB status, etc. The last page or two deal with mental health history and a final page where the doctor may summarize his or her conclusions about the candidate's fitness to serve, along with restrictions: e.g., someone chronically ill would need to be in a city with good medical care, etc.
I did one exam for a patient who was being coerced into serving and who pleaded with me to help him find a way out of serving. Problem was, he was a 6'3" 300 pounder playing football at a Div I college (non-LDS school, full scholarship). If he left on a mission, he would lose the scholarship.
In researching how to help him, I found an article in DesNews (ten years ago) about the Review Committee. Of interest was the fact that roughly half of the physical exam forms are completed by doctors who are not LDS, and that the committee concurs with the hometown doctor's recommendation >95% of the time. The article pointed out this is one of the very few situations where TSCC actually takes the advice or opinion of nonmembers seriously.
In the case of my football player patient, he did have asthma which had sent him to ER a few times in college, so I could trump up that issue, which would probably keep him stateside and out of rural areas, but it wouldn't be enough to disqualify him. Fortunately for him, I found a loophole on the mental health section. I simply wrote the truth: that the patient told me that he did NOT want to serve a mission and that he was being coerced into doing so by local leaders, with the parents as bystanders (parents were not rabid TBM but would not stand up to local leaders). I wrote that I felt this constituted a very serious impediment to mission service and that most likely such a mission would end in failure.
The result was that he did not receive a call, and the ward/stake leaders were told only that it was for "medical reasons", which most assumed to be his asthma. The MTC Review Committee maintained their medical confidentiality per HIPAA regulations, and had they breached confidentiality, they could have been sued by the patient, or I could have reported them to their medical board for violating HIPAA (TBM or not TBM, most doctors know these rules and abide by them). Ward gossip was evenly split between "asthma" and "unworthiness" as the reason he wasn't called. Luckily he was 2400 miles away from the ward spider web.
In your son's case, the board will most likely concur with your hometown doctor. Is this doctor LDS? Does he/she know your and your son's wishes? As far as whether I'd even recommend a bipolar patient for such service, I'd need to know:
1. How long has the person been diagnosed?
2. Is there medication involved? How long has the person been taking medication? When was the last medication change? Do blood levels of the drug need to be monitored?
3. What are the patient's counseling/therapist needs? How often does the person need to see a therapist or psychiatrist?
Personally I'd want to see 6-12 months of stability on the current regimen before recommending anyone for service. Missionary service is stressful and can throw people off kilter if their mental status is tenuous.
The other issue is whether the doctor is LDS. Either way, if you or your son are doing this just to go through the motions (ie. being medically rejected is better than coming home early or rejection for lack of worthiness), and if the doctor is not LDS, you may need to educate the doctor on why a medical rejection is what you want (i.e. if you want the MD to recommend "no service"). If your doctor is LDS, it will be harder and the doc might bend the evaluation in the church's favor "although the applicant is only recently diagnosed with bipolar disease, I feel he will make a fine missionary". If the doctor is LDS but sympathetic to your concerns, perhaps you can be honest with him/her (I've never met a female LDS physician in my life, but I digress.).
If on the other hand you and your son DO want him to serve, but are concerned for his health, this needs to be addressed with the doctor, particularly if Doc is LDS. i.e. "we are supportive of our son's mission but do not want to place his health in jeopardy, so we feel it is vital that you recommend exactly what he needs: weekly counseling, monthly psychiatrist visit, etc. If the doctor spells this out on the form, most likely it will be heeded, as per that DesNews article (review committee concurs with hometown MD >95% of the time). Since the doctor doing the exam is most likely NOT the person treating your son for mental health, a letter from that professional (psychiatrist or whatever) to the doctor doing the evaluation form would be helpful, especially in term of the recommendations for continued mental health care.
You are welcome to e-mail me with any concerns, or of course use the forum discussion board if you prefer.
PS the football player in question married a Catholic girl back east and today is the father of three never-Mo children. I first found the RFM board while researching what I could do to help him avoid service. Prior to him, I had done several physicals for candidates who appeared eager to serve.