Posted by:
TheSkepticChristian
(
)
Date: August 11, 2011 02:45AM
I will probably give you my respond tomorrow.
But you guys can ask FAIR here
http://www.fairlds.org/contact.phpThose guys know a lot more than me, they are the real apologists :)
"Priesthood ban as policy or doctrine"
http://fairmormon.org/Mormonism_and_racial_issues/Blacks_and_the_priesthood/Policy_or_doctrineYou can certainly read here:
http://bycommonconsent.com/2011/07/22/teaching-the-priesthood-restriction/" “The attitude of the Church with reference to the Negroes remains as it has always stood. It is not a matter of the declaration of a policy but of direct commandment from the Lord, on which is founded the doctrine of the Church from the days of its organization, to the effect that Negroes may become members of the Church but that they are not entitled to the priesthood at the present time.”That position has not always been understood or accepted, even by some in the Church. Because it did not receive specific scriptural status in the Doctrine and Covenants, some question its origin; however, not all revelations are made public"
http://rsc.byu.edu/archived/sperry-symposium-classics-doctrine-and-covenants/23-official-declaration%E2%80%932-revelation-priesRemember that official doctrine has to go by a process, The First Presidency, and the Twelve need to be involved, and must have a sustaining vote.
But I don't know much, but tomorrow, probably I will respond with more details, just remember that when something is not official doctrine this can/could apply
Bruce R. McConkie:
Forget everything I have said, or what...Brigham Young...or whomsoever has said...that is contrary to the present revelation. We spoke with a limited understanding and without the light and knowledge that now has come into the world