Posted by:
SusieQ#1
(
)
Date: November 05, 2011 04:06PM
No, not in all cases.
The idea of the NOM movement, as I understand it, is to accept the religion's beliefs,(have a testimony), but they want to help to make changes that make it more acceptable in today's society. There are things they would like to see changed that make it more palatable. They take a positive approach that benefits the members in the society they live in.
In many cases, it appears that many of these members are strongly connected to Mormonism as it's what I call: their tribe as that is how I have concluded Mormonism is best described.
They don't want to leave it, they love their church. It's their home, family, society, heritage, religion, social connections, etc.
In my case, I was a convert, an "adopted member of the tribe" as they explained it to me. It is not my original heritage.
It is, on the other hand, much of my family and will always be.
I left the LDS Church completely because I do not believe in the claims by Joseph Smith Jr, or the need to live any of the teachings, or participate in any of the rituals/ordinances. The NOM movement did not hold any appeal to me, but I understand why it does to many of the members.
There are clearly, many ways to deal with the LDS Church in our lives if it has some impact in one way or another.
My view is to take a positive, polite, position of unconditional love. Accept and respect people: as-is. Treat others the way I want to be treated.
I think there is plenty of room for the NOM movement in the LDS Church. It's a way for the top leadership (mostly very elderly and out of touch) to recognize that their policies are not that effective and they can make changes that do not erode their base.
<~~~ Just my personal opinion.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/05/2011 04:06PM by SusieQ#1.