Posted by:
Every Member a Janitor
(
)
Date: March 13, 2012 10:52AM
Let me get you up to speed. The "volunteer" option is relatively old news. While still practiced in some jurisdictions of the church, the increasingly common practice is to "assign" families to clean the church. In my church jurisdiction, this comes in the form of your name printed in the sacrament bulletin. For example, despite the fact TBM wife and I have never helped with cleaning in the past year and told others we will not do it, our name appeared as one of the families commanded to clean the toilets thus very week.
Let me provide a brief history. Please note this is a general overview, and practices worldwide are not necessarily uniform in form, implementation, or style:
The church at one time had full-time janitors. About twenty years ago, they began to phase them out, giving some early retirement options to some,not renewing contracts to others. In some jurisdictions, members receiving church welfare were asked to perform cleaning services. For a time professional cleaning services, some affiliated with remaining church maintenance employees, did deep cleaning and the bathrooms, leaving volunteer members to perform light cleaning such as vacuuming and emptying the trash.
As time wore on the church realized how much money they could save by members doing all the cleaning. More church maintenance employees were let go, leaving only a skeleton staff to take care of multiple buildings. In one of my recent jurisdictions, a ward member with church facilities management went from overseeing only our chapel to overseeing all chapels within the stake with the same wage and responsibilities. He now coordinates with members to get the job done, and uses some pretty demeaning and manipilative rhetoric to get them to assist. Kinda hard not to blame him. He is concerned for his job, is stretched thin, and needs member help to get it all done.
If you look closely at the chapels, you will notice that whatever benefit the church is getting financially by outsourcing the majority of the cleaning to members, mosly consisting of the faithful tithe payers, is offset by the poor cleaning done and deteriorating conditions. There are some ugly, gross carpets, smelly bathrooms, dirty nursery floors. The system is a failure from that standpoint. But to the perspective of church leaders, it is another way of controlling via guilt. "Members need to step up and take their. Leaning responsibilities seriously. This is the Lord's house."
This policy angers me and contributed greatly. You pay tithing, in part, you would think, to take care of the facilities, but end up caring for them yourself. Having members clean toilets is yet another sign of the disdain the hierarchy has for the membership. Yet the majority of members tow the party line. "The Lord in his wisdom has provided a way by which members can take more ownership in the church."
Frankly, I don't understand. Make them pay for missions, make hem pay 10 percent of their income plus additional offerings, gig back about two percent of donated funds to the ward for its annual budget, build temples primarily with donations of wealthy members, ocassional new chapels, volunteer labor for nearly everything. Where is all the money going?