Posted by:
tombs1
(
)
Date: January 22, 2011 06:58PM
Looking back, I had a really messed up view about something even if I couldn't see it or admited it to myself.
When I joined Mormonism at age 18, my ambition was to one day hold the rank of High Priest. It seemed like those who were older (in their forties or fifties) and not yet high priests had less prestige than those who were. After all if you are a high priest it means that you have been a bishop, high councelor, in a bishopric, ect and must have some leadership skills and be special right?
Even though they always taught us that High Priests and Elders are both equal with a "High Priest holding some of the keys"? It seemed that being a High Priest had more prestiege.
I know I would not have liked being in my late forties and still being an Elder, but I got out of the Morg when I was in my early twenties.
Am I right about this that being a High Priest is more prestigous than being an Elder? And to all of you High Priests out there, I would like to know how it feels?