So fair has a response to the Letter to a CES director. And once again it makes no sense. So glad we have resigned 1 month ago.

http://en.fairmormon.org/Criticism_of_Mormonism/Online_documents/Letter_to_a_CES_Director/Polygamy_%26_Polyandry_Concerns_%26_Questions#.22Of_those_34_women.2C_11_of_them_were_married_women_of_other_living_men.22

Thanks for the reminder about this! I believe Jeremy Runnells (author of the CES Letter) is planning on coming out with a response soon. There has also been an effort here at RfM recently to crowd-source rebuttals to these new "answers" from FAIR.
For anyone interested in reading or contributing, search for topics by user cesletter.
Here's a link (I hope it works!): http://exmormon.org/phorum/search.php?2,author=4255,match_type=USER_ID,match_dates=0,match_threads=0



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/15/2013 02:33AM by msp.

Even in something as short as that section the deception and telling only half of the story is obvious. It is obvious they know the only members left are too stupid to read D&C 132. The dancing around the mother daughter and raising up seed issue was offensive to anyone of intelligence.

subeamnotlogedin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So fair has a response to the Letter to a CES
> director. And once again it (FAIR's apologetic response) makes no sense.

WHAT...... you mean its just the stupid ass MORmON church ?

So their response is "The available evidence also does not support the claim" (which is false) and then a bunch of random facts that have nothing to do with it? Well okay then! Guess I should start going to church again!

Edit: Well I guess the random facts do have something to do with it, under the assumption that there is no supporting evidence.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/15/2013 06:41PM by nickson.